[dhcwg] Request for Review on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6-01
Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com> Thu, 22 March 2012 15:33 UTC
Return-Path: <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4054921F84F8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iBA1DTtEogfD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f66.google.com (mail-pb0-f66.google.com [209.85.160.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FDF21F84B9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcup15 with SMTP id up15so869969pbc.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YrMNkCZi5kEbTcPjyhusVhh6a0qXTLONkoFNcntkoN4=; b=N/rAHCfcoVZcIqbibGCZTdefydoZnVKwjRrBCprapOL1ewrFaojJ4zhAf25qgA/Hfn NEiL8nIOz2KYwc/rCCFsXEwvS3OiPqxbz3l/Bmx2ok/k14/xvPKrfAvJQ7Cw2CVOdV5q 6V5MZw/ITZ7JKdfoE0uarxwhM3/y7cJVXBFAE/3YmuTITkfqr8BmhNOCkKCwF8sDvogr PZtVjH/ST4hwrk+nz25p6ewYBwi3Z6qOXHulSFOmqks/ApIvoTaf0c3JoSngNcJAtod7 mK8wQ+Iua/YpiPZ6Kzwwi+NG72QHWgOi0hECgi/4dwhTI5j9OdkD2WwZq96bsqP2wMvy 7Zgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.201.73 with SMTP id jy9mr21409708pbc.35.1332430435542; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.237.42 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:33:55 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC16W0DXs4q5ApuiyN4pVJVuXQQunAFMGnu5JjJvszcWjnncJA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [dhcwg] Request for Review on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:33:56 -0000
Hi WG, I would like to request for more reviews on the DHCPv4 over IPv6 draft, and thank Tomek, Francis and the earlier reviewers for their valuable inputs. This draft describes a mechanism of allocating IPv4 addresses to devices in IPv6 networks, for the usage of providing residual IPv4 service. The draft is motivated from IPv4-over-IPv6 tunneling mechanisms in the Softwire WG. With the development of tunneling mechanisms which require this DHCP feature (e.g., Public 4over6, Lightweight 4over6, SD-NAT), we authors very much hope to improve the draft, move forward it and possibly meet the timeline. We would really appreciate it if you can provide your valuable comments. Here is the link to the draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6-01 Thanks! ---- Peng Wu
- [dhcwg] Request for Review on draft-ietf-dhc-dhc… Peng Wu
- [dhcwg] draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Alper Yegin
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Cui Yang
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Cui Yang