Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 31 May 2017 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508021293FD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CbvKBAfrz11 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9C0126D85 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id v27so23258734qtg.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=yjeWT7kb/4Ui8BlF/gl48sP+pltc5QpkdpzdaosqYTE=; b=O5k0d9hWLdQHsGxUpRIyhesJf+/h+E9HUhWo6MHCvNszRz1BwJtNcQS2g7Gf1gOH/B Pb5DFKombUH/1AVpJ/I4g7vDQ6lMWH/NY4NDNLh1tmUHQmgPHoS48yiCKkxdp76oqI+w Oz2yZXJGaakKMNRe+mbN7wjcxuTciX4zfzkrug7Ze/yCmM3+oqfUyQ6dB/0VhcEETyTh AqR7faTnn6/Drd/nvuYTOtdRsug4hVIAtUhOYYDc6H/A2oGMEvKJbaaDpbk49435SFEj P8QSrYw9ik7hH8wTKk2sVSVcVA/C9Qac2H7d8lOdk1TyA+iZgDEV+0NEPkZ5FeGuj4YY tWmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yjeWT7kb/4Ui8BlF/gl48sP+pltc5QpkdpzdaosqYTE=; b=efwnw5gGgu0o6vIlcy+ysiEBarDAj7tS44Pxy6uNGz6Dqh/RkMBWIpW5FIQ4XUNswB 9LWNKEiiL364G8V/2gBezTsxkUXRhhwJzP2lQ1T9PiEbDqicb/n0oZl9RJgDqwlqdEPv AL11ZDRxXvtVYr7W+i3gmRXtYKa04SUep2p69zh3z3ifpbJZbmJmfK2urQaW4iuJurSM tfgDOjj6jLQxY1A+MMfaMFmx09G8ZYJrd/qqHelf4Pza/VlitNIjLkJZhcJWy6msMvDT JuoraPvEC/TIEpoZ1Zt2eNoNZMc3hdRW9sjQL4bHf5sKdbAnX318LxtE74/jPkMcdnaq CzbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDZVJZ2bRmT9Le3RQLpi5jZVUM+XhEdMSF1jtMx189zea8AVRho RYXqPjSBv/dA+D7B9RIJVAeFnpgNB0WSM7U=
X-Received: by 10.200.44.186 with SMTP id 55mr32813252qtw.173.1496267666409; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.200.48.141 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <07525FFD-54C7-486E-B71C-9A282FD45967@fugue.com>
References: <C526A41E-9283-4D0F-88CA-EE8F61582D9D@cisco.com> <166ebb54-9a71-5bf9-669b-ff7be6f65ec7@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfT2nDLPsfGWC2-mKdL0QPB9Gc+bik3Gp1VCQWCcmrVRg@mail.gmail.com> <07525FFD-54C7-486E-B71C-9A282FD45967@fugue.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:54:26 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Pscipye-XdFaUu2A3XIiUSyW4uk
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqeE1y3MBSSptWbjEDPkq8LK7mi0sdVxxNUSMQFWX-cq7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/ZnSydTRfoa_3jqLv75AOuzCRAP8>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 21:54:28 -0000

At Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:55 -0400,
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> This is only an issue if the transport can't handle packets larger
> than 512 bytes.

So are you suggesting we should divide large messages into multiple
small chunks and encrypt them separately (and send the result in a
single encapsulated DHCPv6 message)? (Asking just so I can understand
it).

--
JINMEI, Tatuya