Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1C7129B7F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNKvzfONzxSA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A1012025C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-kaloom-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=V8W6PRofRw32cRY7ICs9OUMvmKrb/MwcLRAd0ZkdwSM=; b=dmtkcMmcD4RZLFWjrIceyt7fH//JxzLNRx/lFqV7/tueQruI3eKQghOL/zPs3Y+3fHAT1GcFRiHrf5ND7MuZzHBslkBVcVBgeivRTpU02YikoQ9r688nNxekrRjLAxYYy+HBONhD0VpfR467hwA0r0Tru8QWS5BB1+qGehmyp1w=
Received: from YQXPR01MB0392.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.165.138.18) by YQXPR01MB0389.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.165.138.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1034.10; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:38:49 +0000
Received: from YQXPR01MB0392.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.165.138.18]) by YQXPR01MB0392.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.165.138.18]) with mapi id 15.01.1034.018; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:38:48 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
CC: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "davidmiles@google.com" <davidmiles@google.com>, "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>, "James.Bristow@swisscom.com" <James.Bristow@swisscom.com>, "roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it" <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, "niels@qacafe.com" <niels@qacafe.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
Thread-Index: AQHStVDWuuiX81czlkCrNygpnBjILKHMuVCAgABeRgCAADL3gIAABjwA
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:38:48 +0000
Message-ID: <52C8D6BA-C1CE-43B0-82F6-48BB6799BB59@kaloom.com>
References: <20170414185617.0DC8FB813F0@rfc-editor.org> <1BDC18F7-878D-4B77-A43E-6B87204C77F3@cisco.com> <3C90BC64-08D9-432E-B16E-0A3C59ADFCE1@kaloom.com> <9A5F946F-C968-49AE-A6E7-F24608AEB3BE@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A5F946F-C968-49AE-A6E7-F24608AEB3BE@amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: amsl.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;amsl.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [67.22.228.34]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; YQXPR01MB0389; 7:prX1uRy+/GEeLAgOeaUpMekEcMRbcYfrQYtsGhUYjfrzPqUUNHAYR4pNUN2Qn8971cLpq1TUylnnnIPmXAKHuBxy00rdLGoo9T1QdPfV4emDXLP5JVzm0MAzMzW2MMyRFUdADHKlAs5Q51WghhAkyg7dVg5qrs9d5xZZkNBY3Dm6lHBYvOq1NA72NUxKlI1aqwzzjtJkf6hC0b9fHMChAeg4Pt/1PfPt5fhsx9yyfQHX5PeC161YyKjSubfzaOxnA8celKdSnTvOIPtjWYK4FwETcsRbnj8iRaiOu9lh3flwRkKdUa19urHSRGR2r1pm+fsKY8onhKim+jQAiIWwRA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 08ad58e3-beef-4548-a834-08d48774d8ca
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075); SRVR:YQXPR01MB0389;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <YQXPR01MB03894FC811AAF035F78FB8F6B4180@YQXPR01MB0389.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317)(95692535739014)(1591387915157);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123560025)(2016111802025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(6043046)(6072148); SRVR:YQXPR01MB0389; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:YQXPR01MB0389;
x-forefront-prvs: 028256169F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39830400002)(39450400003)(69234005)(50944005)(377454003)(24454002)(83716003)(6916009)(2950100002)(50986999)(229853002)(82746002)(36756003)(189998001)(7416002)(77096006)(15188155005)(54906002)(6486002)(6436002)(6506006)(80792005)(5660300001)(81166006)(6306002)(8676002)(6512007)(16799955002)(2900100001)(68736007)(38730400002)(53936002)(7736002)(110136004)(4326008)(2906002)(86362001)(102836003)(3846002)(966004)(53546009)(39060400002)(25786009)(6246003)(6116002)(3660700001)(33656002)(305945005)(66066001)(3280700002)(8936002)(122556002)(54356999)(76176999)(93886004)(24704002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:YQXPR01MB0389; H:YQXPR01MB0392.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5BEA072313AD4C44822E7EA739AF25ED@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Apr 2017 22:38:48.7384 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YQXPR01MB0389
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/ZtdZ7jlUt0GpZZoSg25BZyH8M_w>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:50:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:39:02 -0000

> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:16 PM, Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> Just forwarding this message from Amanda at IANA for FYI as I see you were not CC’d.

Thanks Megan. I will go and verify the Erratum.

Regards
Suresh


> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/mf
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-issues-comment@iana.org>
>>> Subject: [IANA #957997] [IANA] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
>>> Date: April 18, 2017 at 2:16:19 PM PDT
>>> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, volz@cisco.com, terry.manderson@icann.org
>>> Reply-To: iana-issues-comment@iana.org
>>> 
>>> Hi Bernie,
>>> 
>>> Megan forwarded us this note about errata 4995.
>>> 
>>> Because the IANA Considerations section specifically says that the entry in the length field is "1," and it's an IETF Consensus registry, we would need an AD-verified errata report in order to change the length to "n." We'll add a link to the errata report to the reference field when we make the change.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Amanda Baber
>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bernie,
>> I will try to figure out how to do the IANA update. I will hold onto the erratum until then.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Suresh
>> 
>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:36 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This erratum is verified. Please update it to reflect that is verified.
>>> 
>>> We can then notify IANA to have the table corrected.
>>> 
>>> - Bernie Volz
>>> 
>>> On 4/14/17, 2:56 PM, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6704,
>>>  "Forcerenew Nonce Authentication".
>>> 
>>>  --------------------------------------
>>>  You may review the report below and at:
>>>  http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6704&eid=4995
>>> 
>>>  --------------------------------------
>>>  Type: Technical
>>>  Reported by: Niels Widger <niels@qacafe.com>
>>> 
>>>  Section: 4
>>> 
>>>  Original Text
>>>  -------------
>>>     IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
>>>     registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
>>>     http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
>>> 
>>>     Tag: 145
>>> 
>>>     Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
>>> 
>>>     Data length: 1
>>> 
>>>     Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
>>> 
>>>     Reference: this document
>>> 
>>>  Corrected Text
>>>  --------------
>>>     IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
>>>     registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
>>>     http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
>>> 
>>>     Tag: 145
>>> 
>>>     Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
>>> 
>>>     Data length: n
>>> 
>>>     Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
>>> 
>>>     Reference: this document
>>> 
>>>  Notes
>>>  -----
>>>  RFC 6704 Section 3.1.1 states that the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option is variable length and contains a list of algorithm types:
>>> 
>>>  The FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option contains code 145, length n, and
>>>     a sequence of algorithms the client supports:
>>> 
>>>               Code   Len   Algorithms
>>>              +-----+-----+----+----+----+
>>>              | 145 |  n  | A1 | A2 | A3 | ....
>>>              +-----+-----+----+----+----+
>>> 
>>>                   Figure 1: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE Option
>>> 
>>>  Instructions:
>>>  -------------
>>>  This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>>  use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>>  rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>>>  can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>>> 
>>>  --------------------------------------
>>>  RFC6704 (draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-07)
>>>  --------------------------------------
>>>  Title               : Forcerenew Nonce Authentication
>>>  Publication Date    : August 2012
>>>  Author(s)           : D. Miles, W. Dec, J. Bristow, R. Maglione
>>>  Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>>  Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
>>>  Area                : Internet
>>>  Stream              : IETF
>>>  Verifying Party     : IESG
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>