Re: [dhcwg] Q for draft-krishnan-dhc-ndc-option-00

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Tue, 27 November 2007 17:54 UTC

Return-path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix4e4-0001vE-JT; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:52 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix4e3-0001v1-J2 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:51 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix4e3-0006Cu-7W for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:51 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Nov 2007 12:54:40 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lARHseoQ024945; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:40 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lARHsK1E014080; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:54:40 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:31 -0500
Received: from [161.44.65.201] ([161.44.65.201]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:31 -0500
Message-Id: <4EEE6EF0-CE54-4A2C-B0E5-54A6EDEABB3B@cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Wes Beebee <wbeebee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA8EB93B28BD0F4C88392699600BD65504A8934C@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Q for draft-krishnan-dhc-ndc-option-00
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:35 -0500
References: <CA8EB93B28BD0F4C88392699600BD65504A8934C@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2007 17:54:31.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FFDE460:01C8311E]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1488; t=1196186080; x=1197050080; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rdroms@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[dhcwg]=20Q=20for=20draft-krishnan-dhc-ndc-option-00 |Sender:=20 |To:=20Wes=20Beebee=20(wbeebee)=20<wbeebee@cisco.com>; bh=dwg683COPLoAf7+G/dd6vf6zttYGqofHqmSAesuyVic=; b=DasbGqQoxCp/HtVWfHJmj62G2LUHXwGUucd2BjWieJUxohmFw+o7rja/Pb00O3Hgk+22PshU +NcJU61eQDFKsqurxR8loWHvJzHuZy3efEc2WVFFk5hmRGxXvYPZUuC+;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=rdroms@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Venaas Stig <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Wes - Stig and I are aware of the broader scope of this discussion and  
have been in touch with the Internet ADs to make sure this draft and  
the related draft draft-krishnan-intarea-ra-dhcp-00 are discussed as  
Internet Area topics.

- Ralph

On Nov 27, 2007, at Nov 27, 2007,12:44 PM, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:

> If we're now going to make major changes to the core of IPv6 and  
> combine
> ND and
> DHCP at this late hour, then it would probably be a good idea to  
> involve
> all the
> stakeholders in this decision - so I'm widening the audience to the  
> IPv6
> ND team
> for comment.
>
> - Wes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Park [mailto:soohong.park@samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:03 PM
> To: 'DHC WG'
> Subject: [dhcwg] Q for draft-krishnan-dhc-ndc-option-00
>
> Just curious what happen if IPv6 Prefix Option and ND Prefix  
> Information
> Option are in use at the same time ?
>
>
>> Neighbor Discovery Information over DHCP        S. Krishnan      15
>> minutes
>>   <draft-krishnan-dhc-ndc-option-00>
>>   Initial discussion for consideration as WG work item
>
>
>
> Daniel Park [at] SAMSUNG Electronics
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg