RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
"Vijayabhaskar A K" <vijayak@india.hp.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 18:22 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16592 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:22:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id NAA13497 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:22:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13046; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:12:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13022 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:12:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel11.hp.com (palrel11.hp.com [156.153.255.246]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16302 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:12:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hpuxsrv.india.hp.com (hpuxsrv.india.hp.com [15.10.45.132]) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD35E00663; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nt4147 (nt4147.india.hp.com [15.10.41.47]) by hpuxsrv.india.hp.com with SMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id XAA20817; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:37:59 +0530 (IST)
Reply-To: vijayak@india.hp.com
From: Vijayabhaskar A K <vijayak@india.hp.com>
To: "'Bernie Volz (EUD)'" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:43:12 +0530
Message-ID: <000b01c19eb9$763afc00$2f290a0f@india.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C19EE7.8FF33800"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <66F66129A77AD411B76200508B65AC69B4CD87@EAMBUNT705>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6Bernie, This option format looks ok for me. We can include it. Vijay -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (EUD) Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:21 AM To: 'vijayak@india.hp.com'; dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 How about defining the option format? I'd suggest we base this more on the Classless Static Routes option. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OPTION_ROUTES | option-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ . . . route-data . . . +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Where route-data is one or more of a sequence of route table entries in the following format: 1 byte <prefix-length> <n> byte <prefix address> 16 byte destination address Where <n> is the minimum number of bytes required to represent <prefix-length> bits of the <prefix address>. A /64 prefix has the following format: 1 byte prefix (value of 64), 8-bytes of the prefix, followed by 16 bytes destination address. - Bernie Volz -----Original Message----- From: Vijayabhaskar A K [mailto:vijayak@india.hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:36 AM To: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 I have gone through the dhcpv6 22 spec. I felt that, static route option (option 33 in RFC 2132) is missing. which is useful for routing. Can we include this option also in the spec? thanks and regards Vijay _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vernon Schryver
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vernon Schryver
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 John Schnizlein
- Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Jim Bound
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling