Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01

I support moving this draft forward as-is ... The rewording I suggested is not necessary for the success of the document me thinks. Having this option available sooner rather than later is preferable. 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
> To: "dhc WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:09:31 AM
> Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC:
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01

> The authors of this document have requested a working group last
> call. There's already been some good review on the list, but more is
> always welcome. Please post comments if you have any, and also
> indicate whether you support advancing the draft as written, or
> oppose doing so. We will evaluate consensus on August 31.

> I should point out that despite its title, this document is about the
> relay agent forwarding the client link layer address. There has been
> discussion on the mailing list about other use cases that involve
> the client sending its own link layer address; while these use cases
> may be of interest to the working group in a later draft, they are
> out of scope for this draft, so please indicate the status of your
> support for the draft as currently scoped. Once this work is done,
> if someone wants to take up work on a new draft with a wider scope,
> the working group will consider doing so.

> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg