Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6

Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de> Wed, 23 January 2002 08:34 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA03777 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:34:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id DAA15295 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:34:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA14580; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:21:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA14560 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:21:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yamato.ccrle.nec.de (yamato.ccrle.nec.de [195.37.70.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA03624 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:21:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from citadel.mobility.ccrle.nec.de ([192.168.156.1]) by yamato.ccrle.nec.de (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g0N8L6H96208; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:21:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar (elgar.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de [192.168.102.180]) by citadel.mobility.ccrle.nec.de (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id 729C2C05B; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:20:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:20:24 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6
Message-ID: <5890000.1011774024@elgar>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020122144616.036c6a28@funnel.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020122144616.036c6a28@funnel.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.1 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I totally agree with this. Escpecially the point of slowing down the 
acceptance process is worth to mention. A lot of IPv6 networks are in the 
deployment process or will be deployed in the near future and DHCPv6 is 
needed for this deployment, i.e. there should be a standard.

Martin



--On Dienstag, Januar 22, 2002 14:55:41 -0500 Ralph Droms 
<rdroms@cisco.com> wrote:

> We've recently experienced a proliferation of proposed and defined
> options for DHCPv6.  Initially, the WG agreed to publish all options that
> were defined at the time the base spec was completed in the same doc.
> I'm having second thoughts about that decision.  Here's what I'm thinking:
>
> * The new options are adding more weight to
>    an already hefty document
> * Keeping all the options in one doc make
>    updating any one option more complicated
> * Reviewing all of these options will slow
>    down the acceptance process
>
> I propose that we put a moratorium on adding any new options to
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt, and move any non-essential options out of
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt into individual drafts.  The definition of
> "essential" is open to discussion; here's a first pass at a list of the
> options to retain in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt:
>
> * DHCP unique identifier option
> * Identity association option
> * IA Address option
> * Requested Temporary Addresses (RTA) Option
> * Option request option
> * Preference option
> * Elapsed Time
> * Client message option
> * Server message option
> * Authentication option
> * Server unicast option
> * Domain Search Option
> * Domain Name Server Option
> * Status Code Option
>
> - Ralph
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>



Martin Stiemerling

NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories      Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de
IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de             IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg