Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6
Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de> Wed, 23 January 2002 08:34 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA03777 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:34:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id DAA15295 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:34:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA14580; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:21:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA14560 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:21:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yamato.ccrle.nec.de (yamato.ccrle.nec.de [195.37.70.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA03624 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:21:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from citadel.mobility.ccrle.nec.de ([192.168.156.1]) by yamato.ccrle.nec.de (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g0N8L6H96208; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:21:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar (elgar.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de [192.168.102.180]) by citadel.mobility.ccrle.nec.de (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id 729C2C05B; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:20:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:20:24 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6
Message-ID: <5890000.1011774024@elgar>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020122144616.036c6a28@funnel.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020122144616.036c6a28@funnel.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.1 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I totally agree with this. Escpecially the point of slowing down the acceptance process is worth to mention. A lot of IPv6 networks are in the deployment process or will be deployed in the near future and DHCPv6 is needed for this deployment, i.e. there should be a standard. Martin --On Dienstag, Januar 22, 2002 14:55:41 -0500 Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> wrote: > We've recently experienced a proliferation of proposed and defined > options for DHCPv6. Initially, the WG agreed to publish all options that > were defined at the time the base spec was completed in the same doc. > I'm having second thoughts about that decision. Here's what I'm thinking: > > * The new options are adding more weight to > an already hefty document > * Keeping all the options in one doc make > updating any one option more complicated > * Reviewing all of these options will slow > down the acceptance process > > I propose that we put a moratorium on adding any new options to > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt, and move any non-essential options out of > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt into individual drafts. The definition of > "essential" is open to discussion; here's a first pass at a list of the > options to retain in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt: > > * DHCP unique identifier option > * Identity association option > * IA Address option > * Requested Temporary Addresses (RTA) Option > * Option request option > * Preference option > * Elapsed Time > * Client message option > * Server message option > * Authentication option > * Server unicast option > * Domain Search Option > * Domain Name Server Option > * Status Code Option > > - Ralph > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > Martin Stiemerling NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Mark Stapp
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jitesh N Verma
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 John Schnizlein
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Richard Barr Hibbs
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jitesh N Verma
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms