IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Wed, 04 August 2004 17:15 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA19963; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:15:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BsPHv-0000Zk-C5; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:10:51 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BsPAV-0007QW-25 for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:03:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18980 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:03:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BsPDo-0003f2-4C for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:06:37 -0400
Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:240:5bf:128:89a7:e1ff:1445:7453]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123051525D; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 02:03:01 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:03:03 +0900
Message-ID: <y7vn01ax2d4.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040803135851.02af6cb0@flask.cisco.com>
References: <y7vacxc5f3r.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <20040803171447.GA27805@sverresborg.uninett.no> <4.3.2.7.2.20040803135851.02af6cb0@flask.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:59:10 -0400, 
>>>>> Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> said:

> I agree with Stig - we've discussed this issue before and come to the 
> conclusion that there is little extra overhead in delivering information 
> that has not changed, so there should be a single lifetime - chosen to be 
> the shortest lifetome of any of the client's parameters.

Okay, I'm fine with the "singe lifetime for all option parameters"
approach.  In fact, I was just wondering without any particular
preference.

But I want the document to be more specific on this point because
other readers might wonder the same point.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email