IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Thu, 01 April 2004 02:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27136 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:17:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8rlA-0000hV-GB for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:16:48 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i312GmWc002689 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:16:48 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8rl9-0000hI-5J for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:16:47 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27127 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8rl6-00052R-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:16:44 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8rkC-000501-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:15:49 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8rjV-0004vV-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:15:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8rjS-0000aY-8q; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:15:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8rjB-0000ZQ-QI for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:14:45 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27051 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:14:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8rj9-0004uK-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:14:43 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8riE-0004rt-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:13:47 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8rhQ-0004nS-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:12:56 -0500
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i312CNn2012272 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdroms-w2k01.cisco.com (che-vpn-cluster-1-39.cisco.com [10.86.240.39]) by flask.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AHG76934; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:12:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040331210913.0262ad68@flask.cisco.com>
X-Sender: rdroms@flask.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:12:20 -0500
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG
In-Reply-To: <5B2E935C-8370-11D8-BF4A-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
References: <000201c41776$e52df2b0$d0412ca1@amer.cisco.com> <000201c41776$e52df2b0$d0412ca1@amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

OK - the *original* question was "Is there any objection to taking on this
review as a dhc WG work item, pending acceptance of the documents by the
midcom WG?"

Let me extend that question to ask for positive responses, as well - please
respond "yes" or "no" to the question "Should the dhc WG take on review of
draft-tran-midcom-dhcp-option-00.txt and
draft-tran-midcom-dhcpv6-option-00.txt, pending acceptance of the documents
by the midcom WG?"

- Ralph



_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status