Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247593A0AE8; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=CkRar7uR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=GXnCNmmp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxbVDsBw8xGy; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805373A0ACF; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=25306; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590608237; x=1591817837; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=FwHnsmgsRI/BSzn+wIHhvUs1oa/zZqYumeGRI/zKt+0=; b=CkRar7uR1Mfn9HGAkG951xVZrSKWuBFPEq3U397r8hcBMcpP3aoMo52U CIBlGV4IY1E5zdh1/3OgeupF8qjeukEgZwKkIKawthWHoXld19L/IAjzl 4YNBFpqp0G+BQN75+gXdRQWybuqu5ExT1DjdX1MVW+29rmWwtsbULQkNT I=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3Ae1ZL9Rx5yaN4J4nXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9p?= =?us-ascii?q?sgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWFt/RgkFGPWp/UuLpIiOvT5qbnX2FIoZOMq2sLf5EEUR?= =?us-ascii?q?gZwd4XkAotDI/gawX7IffmYjZ8EJFEU1lorHC2LUYTH9zxNBXep3So5msUHR?= =?us-ascii?q?PyfQN+OuXyHNvUiMK6n+C/8pHeeUNGnj24NLhzNx6x6w7Ws5ob?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DLBQD3wM5e/4wNJK1mHAEBAQEBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?BARIBAQQEAQFAgUqBIS9SB29YLywKh2EDjT6YQoFCgRADVQsBAQEMAQElCAI?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGERAKCFgIkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVcBC4VyAQEBAQMSGxMBATA?= =?us-ascii?q?HAQ8CAQgRBAEBIQENMh0IAQEEDgUIGoMFgX5NAy4BDqQyAoE5iGF0gTSDAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBYEyAYQAGIIOAwaBOIJkgkiHGBqCAIERQ4JNPoEEgWMBAQOBSBwrS4JPgi2?= =?us-ascii?q?OZYknJYphkCEKglSHM3eQU4JkiQOQHoIDhQeLS4lwj2aEEwIEAgQFAg4BAQW?= =?us-ascii?q?BaiKBVnAVGoJWAQEyUBgNkECDcoUUhUJ0NwIGCAEBAwl8iysBgQ8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,442,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="516592115"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 May 2020 19:37:15 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04RJbFIQ022447 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2020 19:37:15 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:37:15 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:37:15 -0500
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:37:15 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=k4e+v7ZUYVEGmljYUF+GgARX6SLSw1n6aKzbVfrH+FhAQ67Cy6ZEkjNAsyzuXhQV7j5pmGOWHKOhf9d5sBrChU7q8cn3w7Y3eFjnsF6IY4BvacQ1z/Dz2K/J7yUzCl6b9Q55UGvWsBtkWulDg60lretDXK4TeGs9hbHEExUmHh/+NwFo1YtvhgylolAVrL9BiIUT7UQnvNk1G6V/TU3yPNblRgAvqBw/hOz0lW77bHMaX4jdrzaPZioPIf9KQY8TDPq06Qiqd2tPP+hojJ86C1XOWdxWVYtZrCt9XrAA4Nu9PMnGxqovUV9qXWK5sdvqVFYVZ5ucy0QeSK2G3iawaQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c2MsV32kI1bHGRlgSHpC0d+wdXjOAwIxX40bhXm7KiQ=; b=MNMMIUr6jzbxI/VqwQVyf08nKNyr9Rwi8MxkUewrqGbhYHatt6NLbtgtZsKiwDpNQgnQ1JIUnHl2/NahHmghbGu+UGQ5PBHPb8Ke5QyCy+V+y7bseI0m6jbN0UnGMFdWLSFAadG70EJN3ImE2QfKn5i7nNdV2F1iqjWzB/GkTByST0Q2766WS3MbICSnih/+G5qalTzbOToGqI8qcOkbOLjzMFGFe+rHQ0mKvd1ZGIrhyIcUuNMSFpz1uBj2kKpn25Diz5x9SsS5AtDqn447waT0loFTqKZiXcwtM5dQOqcxs/+Zv7jfWAsABlwGozhIMAw6/FqgytsNOCPB3g/vPg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c2MsV32kI1bHGRlgSHpC0d+wdXjOAwIxX40bhXm7KiQ=; b=GXnCNmmpqfF9S3Exmgu+UkrgoNuITVi1mqpgUZBQ+GmF/9wODvfdoEm3v3qq7lrKzW+VkSSWs3n6+cytVUUg8espayOLdLYDortDNSSzfJot7+0LdOWDpwPH6sPZsvC7621w3slIxzQhN3pvobNbuNRcCav5wrQ37P1doprSBUk=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:af::18) by BN7PR11MB2658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:ae::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.27; Wed, 27 May 2020 19:37:12 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7d1c:98b:2131:d35]) by BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7d1c:98b:2131:d35%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.016; Wed, 27 May 2020 19:37:12 +0000
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org>
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020
Thread-Index: AdYnlBw72h8m3/s6QES4usbyMd1QVwMxDHdAAACFQ4A=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 19:37:12 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR11MB25473A693F595ECDEFB18194CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN7PR11MB25478F66E43089F189F98ED4CFA10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN7PR11MB2547A8FA4A7817325482BEF9CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB2547A8FA4A7817325482BEF9CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.66]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bc31cdc0-7255-4b55-02b7-08d802755a8b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2658:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB2658D020E2503C943704D418CFB10@BN7PR11MB2658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 04163EF38A
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 1BqYLPHaWnVSGogjW7vZYD924tBZ7VNcFuLI//YF/xGaluwrhlaZgGdSN6T0PqY6gD4TMrSD1z678RrfIapR41PBDdPwA5oYkNGes54gZWvhtbcEwEGNRKJTrTiUYkuaqzrv3v+rEK5WbHWH/BdDDYT1MWZ0/r9L3gM9ShS7YXUPhQ/5jyeZl5BcH+WKYmb/CtjOeTaNQW1ChDtqgf0pMw0KUWa93vFNMnLgqckiTGo0aP3huB4cpOr2JdKncbzfXNaUqkiiuxjX84GquHe3q0oXgCwKZK/Tc3TCAUOiAzWNBMMBFqUuZTnWQDy7TGKcKmSoKGmHty5UuCupjTGLzl8Fe64Z+kOu+VGWqPz4Oplqwwvn+kcPlZpcJo16WlnRNh9Odx53rol+Mn6skktM5Q==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(376002)(346002)(366004)(71200400001)(2906002)(6916009)(966005)(54906003)(9686003)(316002)(166002)(52536014)(8676002)(478600001)(8936002)(33656002)(2940100002)(450100002)(26005)(4326008)(5660300002)(86362001)(66556008)(7696005)(53546011)(83380400001)(186003)(6506007)(55016002)(66446008)(64756008)(76116006)(66476007)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN7PR11MB25473A693F595ECDEFB18194CFB10BN7PR11MB2547namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bc31cdc0-7255-4b55-02b7-08d802755a8b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2020 19:37:12.4784 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: YOWGNYHFPUJxMvqUniZBmenP7wOGEh0F9kraOCCsdZ4WN7Sl6aUJUjguwycZLZTk
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2658
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/_xpfmmXQrpnv4X3C7z9_6bFMQ00>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 19:37:27 -0000

In regards to the shepherd review, I have the following mostly nits:


  1.  "Behaviour" is used whereas I think the IETF generally uses American English so "behavior" would be more appropriate?
  2.  The acknowledgements has "(AI: add more names here)" that should likely be removed now? Or are there additional names that you planned to add?
  3.  Per the Shepherd Write-up: "Will publication of this document change the status of any existing RFCs? Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? If the RFCs are not listed in the Abstract and Introduction, explain why, and point to the part of the document where the relationship of this document to the other RFCs is discussed. If this information is not in the document, explain why the WG considers it unnecessary.":
     *   The header specifies "Updates: 2563"
     *   The Abstract does not indicate that it updates RFC2563.
     *   The Introduction does not indicate that it updates RFC2563.

It would be a good idea to modify the Abstract and Introduction to include a mention of the updated RFC.

  1.  It might be wise to widen the "field name" in the table in 3.1 to allow for a bit more room and clean up the formatting of the description text (such as for Value).

Thanks much!


  *   Bernie

From: Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 2:59 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020

Hello:

I for the dhc WG chairs, as Tomek is a document author, and in agreement with the v6ops WG chairs, have determined this document passed WGLC.

There were some WGLC comments (in particular, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BfhD_wUVKrVVQIzV4tsw9cualr0/) and the authors need to address these before the document can be sent on.

As shepherd, I will also complete the shepherd review and may have a few additional comments.

However, we do hope to send the document on to our AD and IESG shortly.

Thanks to those that commented during the WGLC and in developing this document. Thanks to the authors for their work on the document.


  *   Bernie

From: dhcwg <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 9:01 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020

Hello:

The authors have requested a WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only (IPv6-Only-Preferred Option for DHCP). This starts a 2 week WGLC for this document.

Please review this document and provide your comments and whether you support this document moving forward or not by May 25th, 2020 (23:59 UTC).

Please see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-v6only. This is a Standards Track document.

There are no IPR notices filed against this work (as of this writing).

Thank you!


  *   Tomek & Bernie