Re: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option
mao shanxiang <maoshx@huawei.com> Wed, 01 September 2004 14:53 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22218; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2SF1-0006IZ-M0; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 06:21:23 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2NQ4-0003Ul-Ls for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:12:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA07133 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:12:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta1.huawei.com ([61.144.161.40] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2NSB-0000Tu-Sm for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:14:40 -0400
Received: from emily (huawei.com [172.17.1.62]) by mta0.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0I3C007M4J3WMG@mta0.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:57:34 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:25:04 +0530
From: mao shanxiang <maoshx@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, 'Keshava' <keshavaak@huawei.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Message-id: <000601c48fdf$d93bf240$db04120a@emily>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-imss-version: 2.7
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-approveListMatch: *@huawei.com
References: <000101c48fc3$748d79c0$6401a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 06:21:21 -0400
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Bernie, if relay includes such option, what is the behavior of the server? the server can return information in the Relay-Reply, but what is the usage for server to analyze such option info? give different policy? can you please clarify me? Regards, Emily ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> To: "'Keshava'" <keshavaak@huawei.com>; <dhcwg@ietf.org>; <ipv6@ietf.org> Cc: <maoshx@huawei.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:01 AM Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option If there's relay specific information that could be used by a server (or other relay), there is no reason the relay can't include this in its Relay-Forw message (and the server return information in the Relay-Reply). Note that Appendix A, Appearance of Options in Message Types, indicates that these are valid: Status Rap. User Vendor Vendor Inter. Recon. Recon. Code Comm. Class Class Spec. ID Msg. Accept R-forw. * * * * R-repl. * * * * - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Keshava Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:10 AM To: dhcwg@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org Cc: keshavaak@huawei.com; maoshx@huawei.com Subject: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option Hi, Can you please clarify in he RFC 3315 (DHCP6) "Appearance of Options in Message Types" section mentions that the dhcp6 relay should support vendor class option. But in the message processing in the "Section 22.16 Vendor Class Option" does not mention any thing about this for relay . It only mentions about how the client should process this. Can some one please clarify this what should be done for dhcp6 relay ? regards, keshava _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option Keshava
- RE: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option mao shanxiang
- RE: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option Bernie Volz
- RE: [dhcwg] dhcp6 verndor class option Bernie Volz