IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-106 DHC WG Draft Minutes

ianfarrer@gmx.com Mon, 02 December 2019 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0E2120862 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:54:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsYZswLkTlVf for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D61812085B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:54:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1575302079; bh=6IkFWFQP9GDL9WWtsD1HBvv5myfg4z8/1mExLu4mstQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=K1x+fMcvKOG/geUdWxwLs5DjlHiNiHSbkl0IThQpeGuiv22LTGwCa6yad9sIEeOFU G+TjBbghv/KgS3PjQQiE0Bmf/V/IwJN5k4H2shSFVyktqC5XluLNZhWcYJY+IvaFde /gN5DatPku/S45+dPNfu0GbvJgAlJ1Obvqt933Og=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.117] ([80.159.240.8]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MJE27-1iMkx33mVX-00KkOt; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:54:38 +0100
From: ianfarrer@gmx.com
Message-Id: <F3A02107-2543-4F55-A36F-7157C211D154@gmx.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8FB10135-364C-496E-88C5-25F60A9C79C9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:54:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4137AC0EFA9DB414B80B2F9ECF430@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
References: <DM6PR11MB4137AC0EFA9DB414B80B2F9ECF430@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:CZHNv0IDIkOj0JK8P6HlI09Hbs4aLuJ5HnVgUXaXhHpZ8WBcnPh 2CcEMlpZd9pNkj+TBYu8b8H+Jpf3sRLvQkVyrURson/xXcrHkimzicjMo5vAUkvccjX8uyo uSCwqQ8Ij0zUK/QorKa5uJOI0yaGRfIX6uAdjwgwL7jgSXRc8TUhnanBGSwdnAXoq8mkP0x 8stlPf+5/atwNP9TEA4TA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:m7jcYnpFhV8=:S+KgglMejZbKzgm3tl9oG8 +5skcHrvyKebxnObf15IlqRYydYIrnP2JDvFlOG7/JbbDDkx1XghZJdT/udH9IaY9Fj8iba03 5pohHrzEfJqIbn6n/C3sh6HnWf8Z0VPbBjWKxqFJdvm+ueIsvnr8NpkQx3Z4bm4KvhC8Bzd2m BHjEz50llG4uMv2uG2fi3TybZ/yxQnMrNYbX/PcqhjNM7wXoT8uk5ZMzv7V6PjUyD/GD2HwAE 8CD6ry62HmXNYngF8oqjcmxoQsNKQuwqIW9HQbkAPwhXI8gigKrFf6BYiySEC9gx2lNpV8pVS S0P1vOqfWfa8woflJ9xU4XXg5lu1TMv5DCBoSwu29alJQ4k/5sNnBW8PAJC0tOkYLmO7wu+9M H3j+C1UFi/7PjgbkebgSeGtM7pVhoHgGqv4Q4CI+S6KjDzTGeEUxF/xIQNTzh7eMLz8SvvPEK TQ+4z0rcJTtIVHUNPX1a0J9SWlBUcOJ5OjMza2xdUwF81jB0ftN5rFWgx+nL6+Podpfyg7DkP n/KoG1p9GKSsLgR80eGicPEscFuy6/99QjkhQMG1B3Ob9ajiEecWhKfnLpHLL7WS0gq4nWv2Q Dx8Z33FGZh2diaL7n8YEJWSQmlcxvHgZFloNtgVxnevvcj+YuOCf0lJsujrXGULqu695OA9EL q9MN3J2RzWQqvxFZxImgfcQoiEVdeI9V4N2sRrQP3LecyjL4ftK5PrtWWn6s/OobjpAIFUncX Q1qm2sex2/T0qAoED3Z3KHIPdsyzfPX7qP2sJTThTpdjyKU1VUciQsjcc/yU5j7Q44dP4OgBu ADU7Bxv6zwh90F/H37w85wYp/wIT3gyahrFuCvcrzOf5l0yFtCU3HRdrPQgDHwiuIeAakMD+I WCGnT+ikFFJAY4nAr9GWsozhaRfEH2boi0S+NJKkZtrWz2dGl6ge5dVpEihGFKrGRa16rFf7D YjW7d3u2jfdi9taLXIJi2RPXgN9Z/CCrVxNwQEdHTr6xMOfzxPF+ZZEs5wKzuAOcO+sb1Wq9m XvoGZZ9uY94O/1kfWEikWbjaS+OMx8y7rCHGpjGj/2IZeOpM9fN8+r/Ax7NMs1yoc/UZfh0ie JWNe4itqaKiQ9BkprO9wGRFnKDXvOQ0FGuFttD0rlZy4OFpR18oLTRmTko6zCmfwjG7UcLHtT dbLHGlrNtIJc7NWWH9Sl7Jba3nDVIMfzY6YaRvHTEH54uxVJxUeJS4tFHmJK1U+JVfWBHh3j6 K2EZKpv6IXokwOahH+LdJ4Dy1vUD+oIjpb2ECmEi55BejXf2YnHtYtIJTHeU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/aqslUDTlSYBfLXOOdUW1wU5-Yh4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-106 DHC WG Draft Minutes
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:54:48 -0000

Hi Bernie,

Thanks for posting them. A couple of comments:

1 question regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang - Do we know who volunteered to review?

1 comment regarding draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements - For the point about the use of RFC2119 language, I noted during that Suresh advised putting the draft back to standards track to solve this, but this is not recorded in the minutes.

Thanks,
Ian

> On 2. Dec 2019, at 16:13, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi:
>  
> I have published DRAFT minutes for the IETF-106 DHC WG session – seehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-dhc-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-dhc-00>.
>  
> They have been reviewed by your co-chairs, but we welcome corrections or other changes.
>  
> Bernie & Tomek
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email