Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02

I am in favor of advancing this work.

BTW, some comments below
Section 4 part 1: This part describes that referring the IA_PD, a new IA_PA option is defined to insert into the DHCP message. 
And Section 5 the last sentence also describes that " However, the two options are different on the semantics and usage models." 
I think it need some more words to describe the difference between these two options in which scenario use IA_PD and in which scenario
use the IA_PA in this part.

Figure 1: I suggest to add message 4 (Request message) after the message 3 to confirm the usage of the new address as the whole 
configuration process. And I also think it is better to add the option name after the DHCP message in the figure 1. 

Some typo: Section 1 the last sentence: supports-support 
         Section 1 paragraph 4 the last sentence: separats->separates

Cheers 
Yu

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:05 AM
To: dhc WG
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02

The authors have requested a working group last call for this draft.   The draft provides a mechanism whereby the DHCP server can indicate to the DHCP client which prefix it should use for autoconfiguration, for instance for CGA address generation.   This draft has been hanging around for a while, and could definitely use more eyes on it.   Please take the time to review it; if you think it's a good idea, please indicate your support for advancing the draft.   If you think it's a bad idea, please indicate that you do not support advancing it.   If you have comments, they would be very much appreciated.

We will determine consensus on August 27.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg