[dhcwg] WG last call for rfc3315bis
Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 24 October 2016 20:24 UTC
Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AF6129974 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMlDH_hMwmZr for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F1D1295EE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id z190so246808157qkc.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=DyzUWtfpKCd27OY5YQpSH4iuxm4HphXNeb3doS68/FI=; b=0O8solm5PZhHqz6fMjwuH3jIUqOVrIRTN1Xs3AhWer9Hp6vZfjWDDDmpe3sRvrOq8w 61XQ4ZngaArqzp0ZVvzwX0DfQfvh+wIYMuY05Pild4Tkax4KZrG87a4H4I6FAPO66qz5 i/j6XLTtF5fiptvTHtxLM1wjDnAq2o6skLEvsmnilZcFfp8oPaOJIO1+T1Bn3XLZ8Pcj 5BQHa5dQjCdg4mw2k8w8wyq//EjhQcacd8sn+uQWn2jXBh0M7MmDbSL20iaTXwYyrIoE no57a2fBZhbVoPqOYaP7gmfzxAvUDlEcmc4x6PJfq37Rlq7Oso8P/V0DLZjvUViboiwW qy/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=DyzUWtfpKCd27OY5YQpSH4iuxm4HphXNeb3doS68/FI=; b=Jv0h9UyyKLpfLVyhBOVO2zWNRfLunArvdZGIsEuwJWcd8B9pQ28d+hMUoljWEg8pNP zfslhTLr/0kyfu5EdmE/6h1Oeafb2lvXIDHOsyZIRaASb16oxyoPTOOLZ+jBRTbREz9/ cT9p6pJfuwnCKjeuno25GPvabGbuehFteProI2W42cTFgNpcJy+LtLJv8PgmfygAo0Gt d85pMSM+fh+j5m5IoWVcZ15b6JDPpmOAAU1LYUFgpgGw5sFp2yc2kuNooRAy8CEYKnOS hOTsyE6NCZF42PtVTpGX5vkAt2PaV7Ac0VEq5xrmHrkFpejRpna/gbE54/rn78xPB7Sl DRGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfAzGJWJQPEF+eQ4NioplAEC+LYO+nutFI1TsMlY04V5dNrKWwqHZL6f8tisjD34g==
X-Received: by 10.55.119.132 with SMTP id s126mr15581894qkc.38.1477340674679; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:4c9e:2fe5:aa9d:1ae4? ([2601:18f:801:600:4c9e:2fe5:aa9d:1ae4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm2333661qkj.5.2016.10.24.13.24.34 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\))
Message-Id: <A4B52AAB-322A-48D3-BC74-6E5B05740168@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:24:33 -0400
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/baxQa0pXUaYJy__rjaVkv55dFgA>
Subject: [dhcwg] WG last call for rfc3315bis
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:24:37 -0000
Hi - I've agreed to act as document shepherd for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis. I have reviewed the mailing list archive for the WG last call on rfc3315bis. I found: * several WG participants expressing support for sending the document to the IESG * one abstention because there are no implementations of the specification in RFC 3315bis * no objections * several thorough reviews that did not explicitly support advancing the document but that did supply valuable feedback to the authors * the major changes to the document had extensive discussion on the mailing list and at IETF meetings On the basis of that review, there is consensus in the WG to send the document to the IESG. The document is currently undergoing final edits based on feedback from the WG last call. When those edits are complete, published, and have had a short review period, the document will be sent on to the IESG. - Ralph
- [dhcwg] WG last call for rfc3315bis Ralph Droms