Re: [dhcwg] Anyone interested in continuing draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt?

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6345311E8223 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AObbgoYQ-AAV for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DD911E811A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ec20so509898lab.28 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o2DkwIgSAQwtDyxDmMLKzY59XGqP3uRlus7ZjU7wTXc=; b=HMMo1FUrjGjaLE9C2mhGMqf7s8D39C+NXUNMcDvhWbmxg0cF1SPfePcxoHfh8M9253 WraMdrPVl4sbbQLdr48j+40YXS2bTTw28Oj+Wg41+geAoxs3DLcjoexgAZBkjPd95kNS ozl/HxL55KXfJ9M8apj6swTbkf1eoKM82SFJyIvWIYilD+cDHvkxjxUnS4bokyY/5NP/ do6PWK6q8iaXqSKpli/DkgyCgpGdP/vfut+ZO9rM415gJBOjvGA7gghIz3CCBiHtLigd ySNWwrfla9muPh9gFIgc7pi+rfnK0XzMSbDwR5Nm8MoXg+Wp0ymj+5WLIQV4IZ5k+ls9 j+lw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.37.103 with SMTP id x7mr6529398laj.28.1377100816716; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.98.227 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077525FA8A@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <52123110.10205@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEDD8B410@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5214BF85.8020509@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077525FA8A@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:00:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfaT2c3j1aFS0Qf2bieRs_MH1xov7CjE0POhMnU75YuiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b5e400192004e47745b3
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Anyone interested in continuing draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:00:19 -0000

Hi Ted,

Isn't it not good to use DHCP options to establish routes? Remember what
happened to

draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-05 in mif?

I don't know if Leaf's document does it though.

Regards,

Behcet


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Alexandru Petrescu <
> alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One point I think is essential is the installment of routes in the DHCP
> > Relay upon Prefix Assignment.
> >
> > The base DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation RFC does not stipulate that DHCP must
> > install a route in the DHCP Relay upon delegation.
> >
> > This draft seems to at least assume it, and to describe much more about
> > it: how various parts of assigned prefixes are aggregated and
> communicated.
>
> I think that it might be helpful to have a document that simply describes
> the problem, and talks about what is currently being done to solve it, and
> then suggests Leaf's solution as another possibility.   This might actually
> be more helpful than the solution document, because it would allow us to
> talk about the problem without first agreeing on a solution.
>
> Would you be willing to work with Leaf on such a document?
>
> (I'm not promising that the working group will adopt it, of course—just
> saying that I think it might be interesting.)
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>