[dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-04: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC7D120227; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security@ietf.org, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.49.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149202959436.15730.7482173620764260658.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:39:54 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/c0DZVVo4eYSJ8y8e3vHvxXboGgk>
Subject: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:39:54 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-04: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am balloting "Yes", but I share the curiosity about whether people will really do this. -3, third paragraph: "MUST exchange messages securely" "Securely" is too ambiguous for a MUST. What specific protections are required? -3, paragraph 4: The list starts with no context. A sentence or paragraph describing the purpose of the list would be helpful.
- [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-rela… Ben Campbell
- Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-… Bernie Volz (volz)