[dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-04: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC7D120227; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security@ietf.org, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.49.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149202959436.15730.7482173620764260658.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:39:54 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/c0DZVVo4eYSJ8y8e3vHvxXboGgk>
Subject: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:39:54 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-04: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am balloting "Yes", but I share the curiosity about whether people will
really do this.

-3, third paragraph: "MUST exchange messages securely"
"Securely" is too ambiguous for a MUST. What specific protections are
required?

-3, paragraph 4:
The list starts with no context. A sentence or paragraph describing the
purpose of the list would be helpful.