Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04

"Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 06:12 UTC

From: "Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04
Thread-Index: Ac15ZFIRL299vwF4RFu+DG7rWScoPwAUWVSQACGG+YA=
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 06:12:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CC4FEA1D.1D9CC%shwethab@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9239F05681@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <ADFB5510243C83418CB48278DF28CD55@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04
Precedence: list

I support this work too.

On 8/14/12 6:13 AM, "Sheng Jiang" <jiangsheng@huawei.com> wrote:

>Support to advance this work.
>
>Sheng
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>>Of Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
>>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:00 PM
>>To: Bernie Volz (volz); Ted Lemon; dhc WG
>>Cc: narasimha.nelakuditi@nokia.com
>>Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04
>>
>>Hi Bernie,
>>
>>Thanks for supporting. Yes, you are right. Version is 04.
>>
>>Regarding including reference to DHCPINFORM, I guess the document talks
>>about server including 'Client Identifier' in OFFER/ACK/NAK irrespective
>>of the
>>message type from the client. Having said that, I think document in it's
>>current
>>state actually covers this scenario as well. Please let me know if you
>>think
>>otherwise.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Gaurav
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bernie Volz (volz)
>>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:16 PM
>>To: Ted Lemon; dhc WG
>>Cc: narasimha.nelakuditi@nokia.com; Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi); Prashant
>>Jhingran (pjhingra)
>>Subject: RE: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 [really -04]
>>
>>The current draft is 04, not 02.
>>
>>I am OK with advancing this draft.
>>
>>However, might be nice to also include DHCPINFORM in this document? The
>>DHCPACK sent in response should also include the Client Identifier
>>option if
>>sent in by the client (while this is generally not broadcast and may not
>>suffer
>>the same issues as the other messages, just be clean to allow the server
>>to
>>have consistent processing to include the Client Identifier in all
>>responses to
>>the client).
>>
>>- Bernie
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>>Of Ted Lemon
>>Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 9:35 AM
>>To: dhc WG
>>Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02
>>
>>The authors have requested a working group last call for this draft.
>>This is
>>the document that clarifies the use of the DHCP client identifier by DHCP
>>servers, particularly in cases where chaddr is zero.   Please review the
>>draft
>>and indicate on the mailing list whether you support its advancement or
>>oppose its advancement.
>>
>>We will determine consensus on August 24.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>dhcwg mailing list
>>dhcwg@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>_______________________________________________
>>dhcwg mailing list
>>dhcwg@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04 Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04 Bernie Volz (volz)
Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04 Sheng Jiang
Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-04 Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)