IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02 - respond by Jan 27, 2014

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 15 January 2014 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F1C1AE3DC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.922
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngG19SzWsGTY for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD151AE134 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g10so4553963wiw.13 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=30Vjiuo0UmY1TdFVrzLf17UryrBV4TN6AhUEb/KpPNI=; b=tej1tZwmT8TAVs+LPveYdaXL4ye7YxM8BJTLA0jBcWSTAWMWJpwtJx8G3H6vBizp7v Pz91uUsFvf4afuSbJIjJoGRCu8mGDbN443ajswzjcRjB9iuEtYdgnV3D+JypVBjnPCUu 2tvPB/Xtp2lQKO1kG4uEIzDvDx2fulPzknl3593xelHy2FY62IyAVl92lto8YnudoHRn GBMYgroen8ixKh2hWN2u1pqOAZinXbiz8hf9pPuFPtakbLwJO+Vm1QWC47i/tjIMGWVT nI0A312cCN7DZ/dfdGHBmGFo7lIeSM+aViyOF68NU1rv8+xu92au71ujpHm+O56RV2Yz RnYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.59.210 with SMTP id b18mr4093757wjr.60.1389811779721; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.120.167 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52D408FD.9000509@viagenie.ca>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE1A630@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <52D408FD.9000509@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:49:39 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: frg6ZJAe3eaawORToaWsWPTJRFQ
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcJ0_PnhNb56HYGcAS0ogUCNzSnwmDDk4q2QLU8FoboGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02 - respond by Jan 27, 2014
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:49:54 -0000

At Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:40:45 -0500,
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

> - Second, is it necessary for the relay to track and report
> *transitions*? Isn't it better to make the relay report the current
> state only, and let the DHCP server figure out the transition based on
> the previous state?

I had a similar or the same question/concern.  I may not fully
understand the background or some details of the proposal, but it
seemed to be introducing a substantial design to relay agents, i.e.,
making them more stateful while they were originally designed to be
highly stateless.

I don't know what can be considered a blocking issue for adoption and
what can be discussed after adoption, but in my gut feeling it's
better to have some rough level consensus on how much we are willing
to allow relay agents to be stateful before adopting it.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.1.27 | Report a Bug | By Email