Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Sun, 09 September 2012 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1535A21F8522 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Euv9TOLsGxJv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog107.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog107.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 65B8221F8518 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob107.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUEyq8xv2TSyDk2PSQqLWKOi0Gly+o2ss@postini.com; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:43:00 PDT
Received: by ieak13 with SMTP id k13so1796651iea.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+ZWxOii/4UggvKk3W6kow6v4ej3xxq0g+eaCBUuV/tE=; b=o0/zvnYcg8z6vHKDROZQNJtnmokYg7NrXBqqlH9XwanpWeArDYdQB6g7nRykzpWR9z AkAYLDCkWMCTEvGTOZN8U/UKQJJh+zCrlmI2Ll9pwqFMXvvQW1zIGu9v3zrLxmfyuonJ ijImxburjYXZbQ3mDMZXpNxA00Ot9kebMHapsE5hFA2Rvr99weHCu3fQ9UK7noOen+gZ NTQ4eQa65nu3x9QrkWtnvl8ofr+uw3hrr7YkGV89qH1I822zG5SVYncXiAENZwSwnDQJ bRbSj9srq/7HSa/wOMh74OVlmi3iYCKCrXGpffSI4KzGQqWc6S+T1+jKUafFi1LgrCZj fllw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.213.97 with SMTP id nr1mr6919001igc.40.1347201779332; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.100.137 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D4B0BD6B-A05C-4B9D-B9AD-894323D0B916@nominum.com>
References: <CAL10_Bqa4ftiVhyyf0ezwKR7mzAEOLNi_K3EJFPFUzPnz7QGPw@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4F3093@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAL10_Br=OcWZuar1fDOopevTy_W-3g9TsYqo61rOWm4tKkuYgg@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61118003F@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <CAL10_BpXdx03WfV1PeMKg1zYc1dAFKe1CDNdrcNf45+_EVCBPg@mail.gmail.com> <CDDB9016-BE11-489A-9361-0172D96A464C@nominum.com> <CAOpJ=k2CJS=FuUvFwOq=s2m871_qfo=xROsW=fx0E48w2wxAqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL10_BoLsdppYKNSfHheYrZg+SfaggoynQf2X11HEdy=ELFUiQ@mail.gmail.com> <5049C317.7090603@gmail.com> <94FA926F-2432-4AE7-BC20-AE7458AB40D9@cisco.com> <CAF4+nEHqRFHbz9qfQuOqpLCNeZqkT=+f53_eCboECfWX8QCt6A@mail.gmail.com> <71F17433-B2D9-4366-9B32-F0E4D294EDB5@nominum.com> <CAF4+nEE6pbmO_ss+3UEpRG1kh2YD20P2KD4CFQ7LwoRZ6gyxsg@mail.gmail.com> <A563FEA0-0A26-431D-BDAA-AD897F691754@nominum.com> <CAF4+nEHbazyx9M982pZ1w8n14xiY_re-Gjy0XXbGbxrtE3jMvg@mail.gmail.com> <D4B0BD6B-A05C-4B9D-B9AD-894323D0B916@nominum.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:42:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL10_Bp8Q-FkVvGT0rFjV3PE1rDGk6iEFOpzaHe7jFMGHnYjpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIwel+6gAco0duDvGwUK5Tv4PaqkoWUqjqBX/126xJc4aq3HMYBRP0NE7sI3sNp8qaU3tL
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:43:01 -0000

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > How much of a rush is there on this?
>
> I don't think there's a huge rush, but Andre might disagree... :)
>

Other than keeping the draft moving along....

Does the WG want to take this on as a working item?  I think we can
get that part of the draft process resolved (and possibly publish
draft-ietf-dhc-loadbv6-00) while we're waiting for the results of
Pearson vs. FNV.

--
Andre Kostur