Re: [dhcwg] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: (with COMMENT)

[[e-mail]]

Hi Zaheduzzaman,

First of all, many thanks for your review and my apologies that it’s taken so long for me to reply.

To your point below, RFC8987 will be included as a normative reference in the next update.

Thanks,
Ian


> On 16. Dec 2021, at 09:41, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks to the authors for their diligent efforts on this document. I really get
> impressed by all the YANG model documents I review. I don't think I have much
> to comment to improve this specification or something that I am worried about.
> 
> I however, think RFC 8987 should be in the normative reference as it is
> referenced from the "RPCs" section. You can let me know it should not.
> 
> 
>