Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption - draft-nalluri-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options - Respond by Aug 10, 2017

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 28 July 2017 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC36131C26 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gTKlP7T-j0S for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3F8127337 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=23234; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1501272573; x=1502482173; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ICBl4W4CoIlP3rk5WMaCnY6/kgDTflLSDdFQhvR/9gk=; b=jamsA4t30aTj5oVJPn6byqJUUcK5Lu6SH/QSxbr30fqkiq1b2zlYOjnf dvJKI1cSzEnqDJhq1OjqRXqRIJ6JoClJ1u29pbRbNHcGdc7Agmv+sAN7/ SuasVqrXT7/TWUZZCG7W9RFCW7dUPENtzV/b1ukMTQyzoHZWrGO3xJcUe E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DAAACTmXtZ/4wNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgm9rZIEUB44Gj3mBa5YLDoIEMIUXAhqDWT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBax0?= =?us-ascii?q?LhRgBAQEBAQIdBgpMEAIBCBEEAQEWEgMCAgIwFAkIAgQOBQiJQ2QQsAuCJieLF?= =?us-ascii?q?wEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyiFLoMngTyCdCsCJCgCB4JUgmEFl2C?= =?us-ascii?q?IDQKHTYxOghWFUopelXEBHziBCncVhhSBTnYBiHGBDgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,427,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="463106000"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Jul 2017 20:09:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6SK9WVC030600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 20:09:32 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:09:31 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:09:31 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
CC: Srinivasa Rao Nalluri <srinivasa.rao.nalluri@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: Call for Adoption - draft-nalluri-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options - Respond by Aug 10, 2017
Thread-Index: AQHTBv/bzGXecLao3Eaq6JadMRK5mqJpqeFA
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 20:09:31 +0000
Message-ID: <1f733a8108284c448667d49132b86555@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <FC7AC530-8EB4-4D21-9FA6-EA89545118FB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC7AC530-8EB4-4D21-9FA6-EA89545118FB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1f733a8108284c448667d49132b86555XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/dRf5jZj-l9lt3lzH3SA6MJ0AvQE>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption - draft-nalluri-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options - Respond by Aug 10, 2017
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 20:09:36 -0000

Hi:

<WG Chair Hat Off>

I support adopting this document.

Some nits:

In section 3.2 and 3.4, the option-len field is described incorrectly:

        option-len:  Length of the 'LWM2M-server-certificate' field in octets

It should be “1 + length of the 'LWM2M-server-certificate' field in octets” (to account for the cert-encoding octet).

And, also in 3.4:


   LWM2M-server-certificate:  Digital certificate of LWM2M server

      encoded accoring to cert-encodeing.  See Section 4<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nalluri-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options-03#section-4> for details

According and encoding are mistyped.


I think the table added in the 03 version in section 4 has a column heading missing to indicate what unspecified/deprecated means? And, not sure why those numbers with document references weren’t included? Also, it isn’t clear why some entries were eliminated? I would either suggest removing the table completely, or reproducing it as it is fully (I understand the reserved values (0 and 5) were removed, but it causes someone to wonder why they aren’t there). Ah … I see that the table was copied from RFC 7296 and not from IANA’s pages. I still think the IANA pages would be better or not to reproduce the table?


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:43 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption - draft-nalluri-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options - Respond by Aug 10, 2017

Hi:

This starts a WG Call for Adoption for the draft-nalluri-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options-03 document. Please respond by August 10, 2017 whether you support adoption of this work or not.

This was presented at IETF-99 and discussed with our Area Director (Suresh) as acceptable work for the DHC WG to adopt given there is no other working group appropriate for this work.

For the presentation at IETF-99, see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-dhc-dhcpv6dhcp-options-for-lwm2m-bootstrap-information-00.pdf.

Thanks much!

-          Tomek & Bernie