Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-01.txt

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114C8129584 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:23:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_Ycxkxmb8nM for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:23:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB1F4129581 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:23:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10890; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1484954592; x=1486164192; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=jBu0F+K+QMM9GXTpxviHreV+IuFxt+xxEUKCIWul8s4=; b=nJOK+nU5nHZLHYs/6IEWg+hF/d/jcPpCIqzG/+yJpXtt51DrWmkwjb/L esTZKP6FMqk90OvWpiJpScq5UmMmpIDSfPArQK1ToaIQp7l+1IyONphzK wm3p3jbGLCKdAMRFahpWgfzGLpWAPqh/hq83c97WtlL18sjKQlgLssVeQ E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DSAQBUmoJY/4wNJK1eGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBgm9OAQEBAQEfYIEQg0yKCKIIhSuCDIYiAhqBez8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYyi?= =?us-ascii?q?EagYjCkwQAgEIQgICAjAlAgQODYh8rzeCJYpEAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBHYs7h0+CXgWbSAGRXZB3knMBHziBRRWGb4kPgQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,260,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="375324181"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Jan 2017 23:23:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0KNNB9N028975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:23:11 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:23:10 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:23:10 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSaG9D0XfUeEfxw0Sn9ambzTJNZaE1P/BQgAn0tQD//6EFoIAAbquA//+dMfCAAzU8UA==
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:23:10 +0000
Message-ID: <5d5eef10e6d749be90f25e8a11d1f611@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <148374230973.17537.14402355403407250708.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <843031F0-B818-4C19-8120-78EE7D531E06@cisco.com> <4328855a5add4c3a9f044689171156f7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <15E46807-72A1-49FC-8E67-A1967243EFA0@cisco.com> <5841cbedc07e485d8499006469968bb1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <746A7C3D-B6A2-462B-91FF-1AE831715DE5@cisco.com> <31b8c717127f43928d0bcb8a5dc71aeb@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <31b8c717127f43928d0bcb8a5dc71aeb@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5d5eef10e6d749be90f25e8a11d1f611XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/dzm8pNW1fXhm_889rNNrSG7g2B8>
Cc: "Enke Chen \(enkechen\)" <enkechen@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:23:15 -0000

Hi:

After an offline discussion, I am fine with the general proposal of how the DHCPv6 handling is per the -01 draft. Sorry for my misunderstanding and the distraction.


-          Bernie