Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A596129862 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:20:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsX1hTECQsrW for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2042C129858 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id w20so92057939qtb.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:20:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=F6aptgqsY67Lj+ksFG7H7DzDLCJmHUcPi+PkgwXIr9k=; b=pfjXsMODX0sSLCP3JRaevrpF0OmhVBCsB5uNvViOFpKxFEp6fxhwNVA2up9/gIFxQ8 wzJI8IIOCg2M/MDfnaisXK/zFDeu5V6lbSK1UEg8EYyUkZ5vm4axRext0aCYzNoSZ3gI N4SH1psStXB3juKyFx+mjQlKZOeQgUbranOFvZV3NqU1uyS+ZL1Hblhx92l+t60Ma3eU NqhnARy6R7yzEddyb7yFMWkMT9w16a+f4sHXCraMcOrJzj4ld1Gis1ydxh4C4NBElunL 8dIGWD2IY1cW7N8RjYgp/9hrBVXEkY00cpvsR3+08qT+i8MKg66P4t+nSPJQtcSNtN1b 2mbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=F6aptgqsY67Lj+ksFG7H7DzDLCJmHUcPi+PkgwXIr9k=; b=hux+60fd8BPEM0z9qH02ztoY7JZPKYIyMgdVyaAuf+458uM94yKp3cAlVTM/bgeSA0 /ycxfnsCIuuCe9ToJ4JtzkOY0iZiDNK+pr3CtvGp6nG8EAgLu5BYWny2X7dlMTlQDoaU svVwLx6D6NX2GvQWYpRZr+QIDWr6z9xM9PHeAUtnD4BA5C5APDNGMSRJi/KNCZAMJpY/ A8LmlvzycXpIrR0B2RZ43tlDfxNe/MbUV0z+Vz3eZjwJtJ3tMnNlnW9CD3bnZUMS97o4 bTSxMWq+9ZZpa6vwmkLmCDu0OssR7Ta3FD/YAzehw5Mr8i1iCht1NEXyAVHD9si33QWv oOUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lIO4Vkiw4B/T5scJ/uCjvJl3hqsV+M/bRK3rRYYk8XFoLKo9Pk7R1d4vrjIzkvyQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.51.186 with SMTP id c55mr22532615qtb.270.1487013630140; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm8114299qtg.7.2017.02.13.11.20.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:20:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <ECE71773-29E9-4FF0-B685-51628CFCDD25@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C1522BA2-C405-4991-A6BE-D29A3586A026"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA19659@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
To: "Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com>
References: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA194E5@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <C51D2F05-A721-4629-844C-4B6227F138A0@thehobsons.co.uk> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA19659@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/emyPltLofF8cMTL86ymYJvp6nI0>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "dhcp-users@lists.isc.org" <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org>, Simon Hobson <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:20:35 -0000

On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Mudric, Dusan (Dusan) <dmudric@avaya.com> wrote:
> I would like to get more feedback from DHCPv6 users. Preferably, to prioritize the list below. What would be the number one priority item from this list that DHCPv6 users would like to address?

You have gotten as much feedback as you're likely to get on the working group mailing list.   As far as I can tell, the feedback is that none of the things you've listed are priorities, and for good reason.