RE: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI

"Kostur, Andre" <akostur@incognito.com> Thu, 22 April 2004 23:07 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA11037 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:07:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BGnDa-0004x2-0o for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:02:54 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3MN2rgn019027 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:02:53 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BGn2W-0000Oi-4R for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:51:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA09656 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:51:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGn2Q-0002ts-TU for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:51:22 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGn1Y-0002d2-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:50:28 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGn0p-0002N3-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:49:43 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BGmez-0008EA-SV; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BGmNs-000645-Nj for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:09:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA05987 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:09:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGmNn-0006Lj-Sc for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:09:23 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGmMo-00065k-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:08:23 -0400
Received: from chimera.incognito.com ([206.172.52.66]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGmLo-0005am-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:07:20 -0400
Received: from homerdmz.incognito.com ([206.172.52.116] helo=HOMER.incognito.com.) by chimera.incognito.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BGmLJ-0006yX-Mq; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:06:49 -0700
Received: by homer.incognito.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <HP3FRFYH>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:06:19 -0700
Message-ID: <B34580038487494C8B7F36DA06160B870125C106@homer.incognito.com>
From: "Kostur, Andre" <akostur@incognito.com>
To: "'Jake Howerton'" <jake@nettera.net>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:06:18 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C428B6.09DB1C50"
X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++)
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60

No device is _required_ to send option 60.

Also, you don't mention what you're trying to accomplish by "separating your
devices".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake Howerton [mailto:jake@nettera.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI
> 
> 
> Do all clients transmit option 60?  I am trying to separate 
> devices on my
> network and am looking to find out if linksys and other 
> consumer routers
> transmit option 60 as well as consumer and enterprise Aps 
> like the Orinoco
> AP1000.  I have my cable modems working with this method.  If 
> there are any
> other effective ways to do this, suggestions are appreciated.