Re: [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP
Robert Yabad <robertyabad@yahoo.com> Sat, 20 November 2010 00:24 UTC
Return-Path: <robertyabad@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FDE3A692E for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:24:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.790, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m11ClgHExgGu for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:24:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.210]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0997F3A67FC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:24:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [98.139.91.62] by nm16.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Nov 2010 00:25:31 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.48] by tm2.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Nov 2010 00:25:31 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1048.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Nov 2010 00:25:31 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 192299.24111.bm@omp1048.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 81152 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Nov 2010 00:25:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1290212730; bh=/lOAY5/C5vOa4To1yoyBD04tnaxrGNQds3OiuNEfmy4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RrZPEJjORL8rwoTQ/0hnBl4Ac3BQxD+KZUkxNbvCgGT7RMnxYXdpHaEuGzMX9DcdaHtt0YUCKrL2eYNm/5583ClPPkGz5TXX0DuvsL9lPx+Gd/YRkeFndYNjypsiWzhOAt5rZpahbzg8oFhSXjaUXn6yrB10szB5OcBD3979xgs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e20SR3PFO7z6+bpob9NucTA2vUoQrruEFnw4Z/IpSer6oFXeUG3gt0P9kHlli5lgk2hIt/ZZ+6mlmi2Vanrsf+Pgr8DxluxvL0lrAylJIenKI2x5/p0BaDcHzfbAo9e3Byz4qx69v6WFOSGkNa/ck1nI143/i+gUuBCutlv9HTA=;
Message-ID: <812397.80497.qm@web112513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 2kVKl74VM1n32pgjUQju3pro4zW7rJjagHhHuqV_gJT_GeO L4_5AeNRdaA9x9SL2c04hbNlb1E4CrDPqSldd65_HMDcXIRaa3adB3WNaDX8 jm3hw8tKnz8vrt_e.7Ud4GwlEbFEq2YmyaoHY5S4ew7rnJaDHL.keDF5BTR3 g4.yDU71FVt4zf1SZPV_iPa1tBBwvs8jl5xi4KIFvdmsshi._XuNM37.z6R5 y4vD4v9sTQKBqOqxPKXKWHUhfPpdSyvymDtj60b6PCwPIynMQxLvTtvIlyjX 8pjDmBH8pXlESa0Rq1vgJaM5l8A--
Received: from [91.86.25.228] by web112513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:25:30 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259
References: <974082.41005.qm@web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CD00C13-C71B-46E0-B9FB-8F4CB78D0D61@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:25:30 -0800
From: Robert Yabad <robertyabad@yahoo.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CD00C13-C71B-46E0-B9FB-8F4CB78D0D61@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1243776464-1290212730=:80497"
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.orgGroup" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:24:44 -0000
Hi Ralph,
Your problem statement is very clear and absolutely very close to my case. But I
did not get your idea in the solution,
let us take the first one (the preferred solution)
"SP server passes container option to RG client, which forwards
contents to RG server; this alternative is the preferred solution"
SP server --FWD--> RG Client --FWD-->RG Server --????->hosts???
Did you meant the RG server will forward these options to the attached hosts?
If so, how does the RG server knows that he should forward these options to the
hosts?
I am sorry I have no practical experience in installing DHCP servers at all. But
all what I need to know
is that: how to deliver some options from SP DHCP server to the cleint host 1
for example regardless of the number of DHCP servers in the way?(please see the
diagram that is shown below.
Client host 1-+ +---------+ +------+ | | RG
| | SP | Client host 2-+ | Client+--- ... ---+ DHCP |
+--+Server | |server| Client host 3-+ +---------+
+------+
Many Thanks
Robert
________________________________
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Robert Yabad <robertyabad@yahoo.com>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org Group" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Sent: Fri, November 19, 2010 10:29:37 PM
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP
Passing options to a host through a CPE was close to the idea behind
draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt
- Ralph
On Nov 19, 2010, at 8:24 PM 11/19/10, Robert Yabad wrote:
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
> To: Robert Yabad <robertyabad@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Fri, November 19, 2010 7:48:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Multi-Level DHCP
>
> On Nov 19, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Robert Yabad wrote:
>> Can we find a way to deliver some configurations from provider DHCP server to
>>host N without configuring the CPE?
>
> Maybe you should bring this up on the working group mailing list.
>
>
> <dhcp.txt>_______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP Robert Yabad
- Re: [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP Robert Yabad
- Re: [dhcwg] Multi-Level DHCP Ralph Droms