Re: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-concat-01.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com> Fri, 01 February 2002 17:18 UTC

Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:07:38 -0600
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-concat-01.txt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v480)
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <200202011642.g11GgmT01529@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <31D01AE8-1736-11D6-8A91-00039317663C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I would like to avoid having these two drafts require the implementation of 
RFC3118, since RFC3118 by itself isn't very deployable.   But you're right 
that RFC3118 does address the security issue, and ought to be mentioned.  
  :'}


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

[dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-concat-01… Thomas Narten
Re: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-conca… Ted Lemon
Re: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-conca… Thomas Narten
RE: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-conca… Bernie Volz (EUD)
Re: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-conca… Ralph Droms
RE: [dhcwg] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-conca… Richard Barr Hibbs