Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something?
Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com> Tue, 22 January 2002 01:36 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA29650 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:36:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id UAA06027 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:36:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA05485; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:27:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA05460 for <dhcwg@ns.ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:27:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.users.bit-net.com (www.bit-net.com [208.146.132.4]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id UAA29533 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.users.bit-net.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/30Jul96-0143PM) id AA16485; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:27:04 -0500
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:27:04 -0500
From: Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something?
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020121141605.032339d8@funnel.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.95.1020121202438.10700A-100000@www.bit-net.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Ralph, I believe the IETF wants to move to SLP for this. I think we need to check. I just don't want to build competing functions. If we do it fine but I think this requires some discussions iwth SLP folks too. /jim On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Ralph Droms wrote: > We've taken an "on-demand" approach to adding options to DHCPv6 - that is, > as options are requested, we've added them. There hasn't been any > intentional oversight; to avoid carrying forward unnecessary options (e.g., > "Impress server"), we've simply started with a clean (or almost clean) > slate. 'bootfile' and 'TFTP server' seem like good candidates for > inclusion in DHCPv6. > > For WG discussion - should the 'bootfile' and 'TFTP server' options be > carried over verbatim to DHCPv6 or are there changes that should be made? > > - Ralph > > At 12:22 AM 1/21/2002 +0000, Michael Johnston wrote: > >There is no bootfile or TFTP server information in the DHCPv6 > >draft. Maybe this is intentional. Is there another mechanism that is to > >be used by network boot clients to locate image servers and download images? > > > >%%michael > >_______________________________________________ > >dhcwg mailing list > >dhcwg@ietf.org > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Michael Johnston
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Mark Stapp
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? dworley
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Erik Guttman
- Re: [dhcwg] Am I missing something? Jim Bound