Re: [dhcwg] IETF-96 (Berlin) DHC WG Session - Agenda Requests

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687A912D195 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCWZ0M4NaEic for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3AD12D11E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=19135; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467816247; x=1469025847; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=+1o2wcst3U+jIEvzh/Yl0CFoNL3o/hGrEYIW297Dm88=; b=Hekp5Ni3duUlzP3oAh1RlylC519ZPHtgF9PAnRHbeNSj4Z3uWU8njL6f iTSVWhMdX6DJNPfuvAPiDOzorZbMF5HSfiNyEpolHkGnpFpFH296M4QeC K+74Agsd0ifxkDuhXiZva4ew85VgBIx9Rt266+aIdVeDZiO91ntzo3i3R U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ACAgASGH1X/4MNJK1dgnBOVnwGqEiOO?= =?us-ascii?q?4IPgXcihXYCgSk4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RMAQEFLVwCAQgRBAEBIQcHMhQJCAEBBBM?= =?us-ascii?q?IiCgOvBwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYp0hBIRAVKFJQWTWYU6AYYIi?= =?us-ascii?q?DeBcYRWiGqQCQEeNoNwboc9Nn8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,319,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="121033749"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Jul 2016 14:44:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u66Ei6IG007716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:44:06 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:44:05 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:44:05 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "'dhcwg@ietf.org'" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IETF-96 (Berlin) DHC WG Session - Agenda Requests
Thread-Index: AdGgpkH9N7+vCsgeRRapIcMHndhsAAK+zeEQAlRqSwAGU8PSwAJUb7FA
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:44:05 +0000
Message-ID: <1d2e18c26e2d47989de95b5c25997f2a@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <5d758f06a15440a49ca2534853045c89@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <7a0799b87af04ad6ad861d57ad405770@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a0799b87af04ad6ad861d57ad405770@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.197]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1d2e18c26e2d47989de95b5c25997f2aXCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/frft6xB7f1M_g4ANIBFFfVuB2E8>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-96 (Berlin) DHC WG Session - Agenda Requests
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:44:15 -0000

Hi:

Final reminder for WG session requests at Berlin. We still have about 50 minutes of unused time on the agenda (based on time requests). Note that we got a 2.5 hour session instead of the 2 hours requested.

The two WG and related drafts currently NOT on the agenda are:

1.       draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-forcerenew-extensions  -- Forcerenew Reconfiguration Extensions for DHCPv4: email sent to authors as to next steps, but nothing received.

2.       draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf -- Customizing DHCP Configuration on the Basis of Network: Awaiting comments from one directorate reviewer (security considerations) and -09 will be published (by 7/8 deadline) and hopefully continue on to IESG after that.

Also, for those with presentation time, please consider preparing your slides as soon as possible.


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 2:01 PM
To: 'dhcwg@ietf.org' <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-96 (Berlin) DHC WG Session - Agenda Requests

Hi:

Another reminder to submit agenda requests.

See https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/agenda/agenda-96-dhc for draft agenda.

We will be meeting Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:00-12:30 Wednesday Morning session I (CEST).

While we requested a 2h time slot, we were assigned 2.5 hours.


-          Bernie

From: Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 1:07 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: IETF-96 (Berlin) DHC WG Session - Agenda Requests

Hi:

Please submit agenda requests as soon as you can if you do plan to present at the DHC WG session in Berlin.

As in the past, please provide:

Title Of Session:
Presenter:
Related Drafts:
Time Required:
Purpose of Session:

We do want to remind those requesting time that you should focus on discussing key issues that need resolution to move a draft forward.

You can view the working agenda at https://github.com/dhcwg/wg/wiki/IETF-96-(Berlin)-DHC-WG-Agenda.

We are now less than 3 months from that next meeting.

Thanks!


-          Tomek & Bernie