Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6

Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de> Thu, 24 January 2002 09:51 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA18587 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 04:51:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id EAA20890 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 04:51:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA20637; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 04:41:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA20612 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 04:41:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yamato.ccrle.nec.de (yamato.ccrle.nec.de [195.37.70.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA18430 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 04:41:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from citadel.mobility.ccrle.nec.de ([192.168.156.1]) by yamato.ccrle.nec.de (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g0O9fBj04579 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:41:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar (elgar.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de [192.168.102.180]) by citadel.mobility.ccrle.nec.de (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id E22F9C05B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:40:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:40:34 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6
Message-ID: <14300000.1011865234@elgar>
In-Reply-To: <69035262-103E-11D6-AF3C-00039317663C@nominum.com>
References: <69035262-103E-11D6-AF3C-00039317663C@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.1 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--On Mittwoch, Januar 23, 2002 21:18:48 +0100 Ted Lemon 
<mellon@nominum.com> wrote:
[...]
> I have to agree here.   I don't see any reason to remove options about
> which there is no controversy from the DHCPv6 draft.   I think it's fine
> to say "no more," but not to start taking them all out.

Ok, is is good to say "keep the already include options and no more". 
Escpecially the people who have already implemented the included options 
would be happy about this and these options looking rather useful for the 
first dhcpv6 deployment.

Martin



Martin Stiemerling

NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories      Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de
IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de             IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg