RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-00

"S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> Sat, 10 April 2004 00:19 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02289 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:19:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC6DE-0004Cq-Ij for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:19:09 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3A0J8fs016164 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:19:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC6DE-0004Cd-EP for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:19:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02278 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC6DB-0006sk-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:19:05 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BC6BA-0006eu-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:17:01 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC6AE-0006Wn-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:16:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC6AE-0003sJ-Bw; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:16:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC69x-0003r4-FM for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:15:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02186 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:15:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC69v-0006Vr-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:15:43 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BC68w-0006P7-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:14:43 -0400
Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC67y-0006BW-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:13:42 -0400
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout3.samsung.com by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HVX0040DHXY7U@mailout3.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:10 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp1 (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HVX00MP7HXSC8@mailout3.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:04 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.202.103]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HVX00KBHHXSTS@mmp1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:04 +0900 (KST)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:26 +0900
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-00
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040408090911.02af0ed8@flask.cisco.com>
To: 'Ralph Droms' <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Message-id: <00b101c41e90$a4c75fb0$67cadba8@LocalHost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ralph, thanks your editorial comments on 
this draft and as Bernie indicated, I will also 
wait for additional comments during the WGLC.

Regarding IPR comment, I have no any hard
stance. Anyway I will also show a concrete
statement on that after WGLC.



- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ralph Droms
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:21 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on 
> draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-00
> 
> 
> I see that this draft includes a notice regarding IPR.  The 
> Samsung IPR
> statement appears to apply across all IETF submissions.  Can 
> the authors
> clarify if there are any IPR claims that apply specifically 
> to this document?
> 
> The format of the option - specifically, option length == 0 - 
> is consistent
> with other DHCP options.  Will length 0 cause problems in 
> practice with
> deployed DHCP servers?
> 
> The document should be republished to include RFC 3667 boilerplate,
> including the RFC 3667 IPR notification statement.
> 
> I have one editorial comment: the document should indicate 
> that the use of
> Rapid Commit is optional on the part of the client, under 
> local (client)
> admin control.  In section 3, I suggest changing the first sentence:
> 
>       A client that supports the Rapid Commit option SHOULD 
> include it in
>       DHCPDISCOVER messages that it sends.
> 
> to:
> 
>       If a client that supports the Rapid Commit option intends to use
>       the rapid commit capability, it includes a Rapid Commit 
> option in
>       DHCPDISCOVER messages that it sends.
> 
> In section 3.1, list item 1, I suggest changing the first sentence:
> 
>          1. The client broadcasts a DHCPDISCOVER message on its local
>             physical subnet and  SHOULD include the Rapid 
> Commit option if
>             it supports this option.
> 
> to:
> 
>          1. The client broadcasts a DHCPDISCOVER message on its local
>             physical.  If the client supports the Rapid Commit option
>             and intends to use the rapid commit capability, 
> it includes
>             a Rapid Commit option in the DHCPDISCOVER message.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg