RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-00
"S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> Sat, 10 April 2004 00:19 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02289 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:19:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC6DE-0004Cq-Ij for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:19:09 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3A0J8fs016164 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:19:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC6DE-0004Cd-EP for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:19:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02278 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC6DB-0006sk-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:19:05 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BC6BA-0006eu-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:17:01 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC6AE-0006Wn-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:16:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC6AE-0003sJ-Bw; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:16:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC69x-0003r4-FM for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:15:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02186 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:15:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC69v-0006Vr-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:15:43 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BC68w-0006P7-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:14:43 -0400
Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC67y-0006BW-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:13:42 -0400
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout3.samsung.com by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HVX0040DHXY7U@mailout3.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:10 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp1 (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HVX00MP7HXSC8@mailout3.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:04 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.202.103]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HVX00KBHHXSTS@mmp1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:04 +0900 (KST)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:13:26 +0900
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-00
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040408090911.02af0ed8@flask.cisco.com>
To: 'Ralph Droms' <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Message-id: <00b101c41e90$a4c75fb0$67cadba8@LocalHost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ralph, thanks your editorial comments on this draft and as Bernie indicated, I will also wait for additional comments during the WGLC. Regarding IPR comment, I have no any hard stance. Anyway I will also show a concrete statement on that after WGLC. - Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) - Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. > -----Original Message----- > From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Ralph Droms > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:21 PM > To: dhcwg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on > draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-00 > > > I see that this draft includes a notice regarding IPR. The > Samsung IPR > statement appears to apply across all IETF submissions. Can > the authors > clarify if there are any IPR claims that apply specifically > to this document? > > The format of the option - specifically, option length == 0 - > is consistent > with other DHCP options. Will length 0 cause problems in > practice with > deployed DHCP servers? > > The document should be republished to include RFC 3667 boilerplate, > including the RFC 3667 IPR notification statement. > > I have one editorial comment: the document should indicate > that the use of > Rapid Commit is optional on the part of the client, under > local (client) > admin control. In section 3, I suggest changing the first sentence: > > A client that supports the Rapid Commit option SHOULD > include it in > DHCPDISCOVER messages that it sends. > > to: > > If a client that supports the Rapid Commit option intends to use > the rapid commit capability, it includes a Rapid Commit > option in > DHCPDISCOVER messages that it sends. > > In section 3.1, list item 1, I suggest changing the first sentence: > > 1. The client broadcasts a DHCPDISCOVER message on its local > physical subnet and SHOULD include the Rapid > Commit option if > it supports this option. > > to: > > 1. The client broadcasts a DHCPDISCOVER message on its local > physical. If the client supports the Rapid Commit option > and intends to use the rapid commit capability, > it includes > a Rapid Commit option in the DHCPDISCOVER message. > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-ra… Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-ra… S. Daniel Park