Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 15 May 2002 21:09 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA22330 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id RAA02809 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA02761; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:08:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA02728 for <dhcwg@ns.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:08:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA22274 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 17:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from green.bisbee.fugue.com (dsl-64-193-175-153.telocity.com [64.193.175.153]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.3/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g4FL7JS07967; Wed, 15 May 2002 14:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tongpanyi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.bisbee.fugue.com (8.10.2/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g4FL8Yd02021; Wed, 15 May 2002 16:08:34 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:08:34 -0500
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481)
Cc: 'Katia Linker' <KatiaL@radlan.com>, DHCP IETF mailing list <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: "Kostur, Andre" <Andre@incognito.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FB49E60CFBA724E88867317DAA3D19849589D@homer.incognito.com.>
Message-Id: <EA8DB988-6847-11D6-B998-00039367340A@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id RAA02729
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> The original poster did ask what the _maximum_ length the options field > may be (not the minimum), and he did mention that he already knew that the > minimum was 312 bytes. That passage from the RFC does not mention the > maximum size, only the minimum size. It does continue to say that if the > client can handle larger message sizes it should supply option 57 to > negotiate the larger sized packets. On the contrary, the only size that section specifies is the maximum size. It says the field is variable length, and the maximum size a client has to be able to accept is 312 bytes of options (576 bytes total). It is perfectly permissible to send fewer than 312 bytes of options. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] "Options" field Katia Linker
- RE: [dhcwg] "Options" field Kostur, Andre
- Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] "Options" field Kostur, Andre
- Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] "Options" field Kostur, Andre
- Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] "Options" field Kostur, Andre
- Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field Ted Lemon