Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013

Mathias Samuelson <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213D61AE0EA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38rYAgxNIIdO for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B101AE0E1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUouZS4vTOk+9IPGB5pVE1rearXvaGhCU@postini.com; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:00:59 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1388D1B82E1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:00:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D395A190043; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:00:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:00:58 -0800
From: Mathias Samuelson <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013
Thread-Index: Ac7e9nJH09KfY3gLTLmf3uiXHP4jdgGlYfYA
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:00:58 +0000
Message-ID: <28184790-4053-4272-BDE5-E3E9393193E7@nominum.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89A8C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89A8C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2818479040534272BDE5E3E9393193E7nominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:01:34 -0000

I'm neutral on whether this should be adopted as a DHCPv6 only effort.

Lack of support for DHCPv4 is IMHO problematic since most network operators still operate IPv4 networks of one form or the other, and with my product manager hat on, I think there is a lot of appeal in making products that are consistent across IPv4 and IPv6 (to the greatest extent possible of course).

I would def supporting adopting this work if it was made broader to support DHCPv4 as well.

Thanks
Mathias

On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com<mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi all:

At the Vancouver IETF DHC WG session, there was support for adopting draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00. (You can view the presentation given by Kim Kinnear athttp://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-dhc-2.pptx.)

This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is indeed WG consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG item. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on November 25, 2013.

The HTML version of the document can be viewed at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery.

Note: As this is not work explicitly mentioned in the Charter (while it is an extension as mentioned under bullet 1, it is not explicitly on the list of topics), we will have a discussion with our AD to get it approved in parallel to this call for adoption (given the level of support expressed at the DHC WG meeting).

Regards,
Tomek & Bernie

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

Mathias Samuelson | Sr. Product Manager
mobile: +1.650.491.4193 | office: +1.650.381.6225
Nominum | www.nominum.com<http://www.nominum.com/> | mathias.samuelson@nominum.com<mailto:mathias.samuelson@nominum.com>