IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 12 August 2016 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481DF12D0AB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dEVUCcy_k36 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9022012B00C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1361; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471030712; x=1472240312; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KhqLhbZQh12JbmNq/GuVY30JQaN5guthspVj2SRUPYE=; b=W6RKlL3gU0fzV0aHkyBKVylzbyR/wZcMAZUs0qd0PlKwqYyV8iuLR88E y6yi3B6i4VLI+LH7qIwL1JIhzDsellwxNePyNvvxqKtwXKV/36dijhV3G 0qTLe9XjIdbsiq+InoSa/kHOFBjoo/CdBSZr2laaXyCtIYBerc2DfmlLw 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AkAwAEJa5X/51dJa1eg0RWfAe5KYF9JIV5AoFIOBQBAQEBAQEBXSeEXgEBBAEBATg0CwUHBAIBCBABBAEBHwkHJwsUCQgCBA4FCIghCA6/aAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFineEIwEBCxeFVAWZPAGGHYhwj0qMNYN3AR42g3puAYV0N38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,512,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="137260689"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Aug 2016 19:38:30 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7CJcUu3011456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:38:30 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:38:29 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:38:29 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
Thread-Index: AQHR9NA4CHku5xpnb0Wx+Hz1v40PpaBFt3GA
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:38:29 +0000
Message-ID: <c5303eef3c124228825f32a40f229107@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: Your message of Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:10:10 -0000. <92dcf2e0cf08452caa5861f7258ea6c5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <201608121919.u7CJJqcS056876@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201608121919.u7CJJqcS056876@givry.fdupont.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/gter_ewYDfXtvO1tNqcy_iHGeSQ>
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:38:34 -0000

I second this ... mostly because:

1. It is still very much a work in progress.
2. Several previous attempts at this had to be rebooted; while we hope that isn't the case this time around ...
3. This is the base standard and extensions to it will always exist.

Note: We only reference two drafts, prefix-length-hints and topo-conf. Topo-conf will be an RFC well before this one (it is at RFC-editor). And, we still need to finalize what we do re: prefix-length-hints in this document (see Ticket #114 - https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/ticket/114).

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francis Dupont
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 3:20 PM
To: Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: <dhcwg@ietf.org> <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  Should RFC3315(bis) cite 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6?

=> IMHO it should not and in particular it should not be referenced as a replacement for authentication according to the new direction taken by secdhcpv6 (i.e., encryption vs authentication).

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email