[dhcwg] RE: About OPTION_DSTM_TEP option

"Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se> Tue, 15 January 2002 02:04 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA29278 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:04:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id VAA05653 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:04:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA05141; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:53:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA05114 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:53:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imr2.ericy.com (imr2.ericy.com [198.24.6.3]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA29044 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:53:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mr6.exu.ericsson.se (mr6att.ericy.com [138.85.224.157]) by imr2.ericy.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0F1quJ21082 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:52:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se (eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.37]) by mr6.exu.ericsson.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0F1qut23969 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:52:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: FROM eamrcnt761.exu.ericsson.se BY eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se ; Mon Jan 14 19:52:55 2002 -0600
Received: by eamrcnt761.exu.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <ZP0QKB63>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:52:55 -0600
Message-ID: <66F66129A77AD411B76200508B65AC69B4CD82@EAMBUNT705>
From: "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>
To: 'Kyemyung Jung' <jgm2000@i2soft.net>, seamus@bit-net.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:52:53 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19D67.583BA220"
Subject: [dhcwg] RE: About OPTION_DSTM_TEP option
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org

A client doesn't send the DSTM_TEP option (except perhaps when echoing back what the server provided earlier to the client in an Advertise or Reply). This option is really for SERVER to CLIENT communication as the server provides the address of the tunnel end point *TO* the client. At least that is my understanding from what is in the DSTM draft.

There is no reason for a client to request it. The server will send it if the DSTM option is used and a tunnel end point exists.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Kyemyung Jung [mailto:jgm2000@i2soft.net]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:39 PM
To: seamus@bit-net.com; Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se; dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: About OPTION_DSTM_TEP option 


Thanks for your answers. 

I have a question about OPTION_DSTM_TEP option. 

When a client wants to store TEP address, how does the client send OPTION_DSTM_TEP ? 

 Does the client send OPTION_DSTM_TEP option encapsulated in DSTM Global Address option or thru ORO?

 Are both of them possible?

I hope you to answer my question. 

Have nice a day !!