Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00

I’ve read the draft and can see some potentially useful applications for this, so I think it should be moved forward.

Cheers,
Ian

On 11 Feb 2014, at 21:38, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
> There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but
> we never saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors
> confidence in those proposals are high due to existing implementations,
> they have requested WGLC.
> 
> After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead
> with the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
> Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A
> simple "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the
> trick here.
> 
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00. Please send
> your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very
> similar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
> If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft
> (v4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.
> 
> Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do
> the shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd
> for one of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior
> IETF experience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight
> into the WGLC process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such
> an experience can be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.
> 
> Bernie & Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28