[dhcwg] Retransmission side

"Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com> Thu, 20 September 2001 06:53 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA01642; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:53:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA11877; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA11851 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:52:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from calliope1.fm.intel.com (fmfdns01.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.10]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA01558 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:52:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxv042-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.48.110]) by calliope1.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4, v 1.42 2001/09/04 16:24:19 root Exp $) with SMTP id GAA21449 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:52:01 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.42.29]) by fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.1.6) with SMTP id M2001091923512900818 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:51:29 -0700
Received: from alpha.igk.intel.com ([172.28.168.68]) by fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id THAKCRQM; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:52:05 -0700
Received: by alpha.igk.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <NMB58BM0>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:51:59 +0200
Message-ID: <413FBB0BA5AED1119122000083234B1A0247B425@alpha.igk.intel.com>
From: "Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com>
To: "Dhcwg (E-mail)" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:51:52 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Subject: [dhcwg] Retransmission side
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org

> Hello,
> 
> I've looked hard into the recent discussion on retransmission. 
> I would like to get one thing straight, correct me if I'm wrong with this:
> 
> If a message from the client to the server is "Lost In Transit", 
> the client retransmits. (OK so far :))
> 
> If a message from the server to the client is "LIT", the CLIENT 
> retransmits its message. The server notes the repeat and replies 
> with the same data as before. The server itself does not check,
> whether the reply reached the client.
> 
> (Except for Reconfig-Init, which is a server-initiated exchange,
> so the server retransmits this message until it gets the REQUEST
> from the client.)
> 
> I hope I understood your intentions in this matter.
> 
> Please, comment.
> 
> Artur G.
> (TUG student)

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg