RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field
"Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se> Tue, 25 September 2001 16:33 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA08601; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:33:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA15386; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA15362 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [208.237.135.240]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA08566 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mr7.exu.ericsson.se (mr7u3.ericy.com [208.237.135.122]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8PGWm715372 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:32:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se (eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.37]) by mr7.exu.ericsson.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f8PGWl119568 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:32:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: FROM eamrcnt760.exu.ericsson.se BY eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se ; Tue Sep 25 11:32:47 2001 -0500
Received: by eamrcnt760.exu.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <THQG9HJN>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:32:47 -0500
Message-ID: <66F66129A77AD411B76200508B65AC69904670@eambunt705.ena-east.ericsson.se>
From: "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, "Dhcwg (E-mail)" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:32:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C145DF.B5191CF0"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
I think it is fine to leave the text in 17.1 as is. The address does need to be meaningful to the DHCP server but that is made clear in the third sentence. - Bernie
- [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Anil Kumar Reddy. S
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Vijay Bhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Question on Relay address field Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: FW: [dhcwg] co-existence of temp and normal a… Thomas Narten