IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration-01

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF98821F9F31 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.143
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnBFdYRlvLB6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701AC21F9FD5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8074; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1379955820; x=1381165420; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=0CtUdj1xbzJg7gTghs8oTuugIEPTjIe9+dGTszHcSdk=; b=EHPLcBQRfl8gMUCUloOs7cdMXamko96nx2NnNCKKoQkVsRoV7BZgtn5r V+1GmTZdp9oxeR/LG2NYSmzeA5qGzVC3gXgGTDScRVEWAX43wslogdqLY eyQLLfK4ZomoF9IZFPu8dsEs38mAWI3wsDHVKgwEm/K0+IuX834bD6CiF E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.90,963,1371081600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="263372386"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2013 17:03:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8NH3d0k012506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:03:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.21]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:03:39 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "branimir.rajtar@t.ht.hr" <branimir.rajtar@t.ht.hr>, "ian.farrer@telekom.de" <ian.farrer@telekom.de>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration-01
Thread-Index: Ac64fVaRAai1dClrRLiy1Fy1RYAaWg==
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:03:38 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AC90A2B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.211.87]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AC90A2Bxmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Ole Troan (ot@cisco.com)" <ot@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:03:50 -0000

Hi:

The WG has a milestone coming up to do a WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration.

While we didn't find it in the IETF-87 minutes (dhc or sunset4 wg), both Tomek and I recall some discussion of including draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv4osw in draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration for completeness? Perhaps it was on the mailing list - Ian on 6/13/2013 wrote:


"I'm just doing an update to draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration. Could you have a look through the DHCPv4oSW relevant sections and see if you think that any changes need to be made based on your draft / this discussion?"



And Ole responded on 6/18.

But the v4configuration document published is dated May 28 so it could not have included that. And, perhaps there were other updates pending that never got published?

So, can the authors of v4configuration prepare the document for WGLC by checking the IETF-87 minutes and email discussions to see what, if any, changes may be appropriate and republish if needed. Of course, if anyone has any comments regarding this document, please also let the authors know.

Thanks much!


-          Tomek & Bernie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email