IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 06 August 2015 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D2A1A8911 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 07:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHq_PUS10Vdz for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 07:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:8240:6:a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 130081A88C4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 07:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [84.47.113.16] (helo=[192.168.1.14]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1ZNMI5-0004HP-Jf; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:37:05 +0200
Message-ID: <55C3710A.2020506@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:36:58 +0200
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB90384@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <55BB7FF9.1060600@si6networks.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB93E65@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB93E65@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/ix6B-NRiEXBibP8paPySspmQEgM>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:37:20 -0000

Bernie,

On 07/31/2015 04:28 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> 
> But we haven't yet seen sufficient support for continuing this work.
> And unless we do, there's little point in doing so as it obviously
> does not have WG consensus to move forward.

mm... wasn't it better to ask folks to contribute, or poll whether
anyone was willing to review, rather than first opting to drop the I-D
before trying the other option first?



> Actually, my proposal to drop this work was to assure that if people
> felt it was important, they WOULD respond. Just asking a vague "do
> you support this work" tends to get little response.

I agree. But that is the same for asking for a vague "hum to drop" when,
as noted a few times already the main technical comments 8from Lorenzo)
were bogus, and the other nits (from Tomek) simply require a tweak.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email