Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Fri, 24 August 2012 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8234621F85F4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4RbymcL1nJI for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51F421F85EA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb.lan (modemcable180.211-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.211.180]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17AB0425F1; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:18:40 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <91484F36-D059-4D90-8BFE-60434864A579@nominum.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:18:39 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6A9A63FB-3760-4B86-AD5A-D23A9EEEF9F8@viagenie.ca>
References: <91484F36-D059-4D90-8BFE-60434864A579@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt-08
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:18:41 -0000

support for wg adoption. Marc.

Le 2012-08-24 à 11:32, Ted Lemon a écrit :

> The authors have proposed that the working group adopt the prefix pool option draft as a working group item.   We have engaged in some correspondence with participants in the Routing Area, and while some helpful advice was given, no objections were raised to going forward with the work, and it's a DHCP protocol extension, so it makes sense for it to happen in the DHC working group.
> 
> The document proposes an extension to the DHCP protocol that allows the DHCP server to communicate prefixes to the provider edge router when doing prefix delegation, such that this router can advertise a route to an aggregate prefix, rather than to many individual prefixes, and so that this router does not have to perform ad-hoc prefix aggregation, which may produce less optimal results.
> 
> If you think this work should be adopted by the working group, please reply to this message saying so.   If you think this work should not be adopted by the working group, please reply to this message saying so.   We will evaluate consensus on September 7.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg