[dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 16 August 2012 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0747A21F85D0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6c3Bs-aFO4l for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016DD21F85C5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUCz/HItIh3rFCs7HhUdLKTn0XM9OIqYn@postini.com; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:33 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1671B82E0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13026190052 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:09:31 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01
Thread-Index: AQHNe7jBKYqvqlvJTk2cfeufL7tTPA==
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:09:31 +0000
Message-ID: <A87A2CCB-21D2-4437-9021-11013FB8218E@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <213425207EC6E04E8EA7C65A7CFBC3F0@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:09:34 -0000

The authors of this document have requested a working group last call.   There's already been some good review on the list, but more is always welcome.   Please post comments if you have any, and also indicate whether you support advancing the draft as written, or oppose doing so.   We will evaluate consensus on August 31.

I should point out that despite its title, this document is about the relay agent forwarding the client link layer address.   There has been discussion on the mailing list about other use cases that involve the client sending its own link layer address; while these use cases may be of interest to the working group in a later draft, they are out of scope for this draft, so please indicate the status of your support for the draft as currently scoped.   Once this work is done, if someone wants to take up work on a new draft with a wider scope, the working group will consider doing so.