Re: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> Wed, 15 December 2021 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060EF3A085B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qacafe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-2IJy8wh5_r for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 218313A082A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id z7so43520469lfi.11 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:41:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qacafe.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1WSxNvs4Jxm/OEZGIKAzIEaFgzFuCtKNPaX1HinSndU=; b=ZpUMV7sXX7jPbF0+zV3B+Gruq7FqzDiuq7ziYGG9j6CS7iOa0N9iX2EUmqebjYc4La wd0CS/cU9RpcMltosK6N5Cz5oawJy3uNbUs85ceGGHmZSmYhpzeHi8hHukkkBvqqlnJA rV8peOXIwnw7TRQPqBPS7vBjvi/XucsqTmlYs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1WSxNvs4Jxm/OEZGIKAzIEaFgzFuCtKNPaX1HinSndU=; b=sT5PhNWMIwYJwF+rdc0W28dfUKbRs6G2lvHu7wNvnUWeYakVKR1ToVtcz/lOcEe1i2 khEEQSPRmagxBM/pzaIwh2TSo8USb2m9okDqJbp0CvD0RDRALLITUmcirR0SPdmjsiju bsPxP5roUIpR+mJac/vBFKCjkwrXM95UbV3i2UldZaFpC4IDOkGNgJNjTw8GQAeZ+n/N b9OKFlEci2dcoE+E7mwANKiRfqi8g3axasxcSTmMuk+WlsaWUGXlvr5pWzhBzalfOa/i VI41Dplslu3/StuLXYbTVrLJuaAtbR6R9/mlfxFlL67tIKdmRdn6lKvzTVyUFSOkHrnx sGcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iGLZalyxzSljhVBMDreKg7Vc5IIfbhrhQF+G55dtCuO4AX11V eFA3WRUWIkz2HE8Th0SHejaHdDYqGtkS4qeGzzCtSg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoxrtgXJtSUkTgrmBetigckjwFazD2lXx+Myu6IKQNNTRqffc5OCu8bdRH6N2+mvHlIKq/DV1XxMUNCIL5Q0M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1109:: with SMTP id l9mr9820493lfg.181.1639579283483; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:41:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163955145413.10392.15987440783848564312@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163955145413.10392.15987440783848564312@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:41:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJgLMKup0p1Ro+kfvQ5b-NBnOMO7hFF=Cs+LfCHh1gyhMM8DkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c6067d05d3304cb6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/k1E6chPfjQliNblZeqkCfCX6aek>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:41:33 -0000

Hi Murray,

My apologies. I asked the question during the write-up process but must
have missed recording the answer.   I have updated the shepard document.

Mailing list of question and answer:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/4AsYOwIHx9L3JaNz6rF_v5LqzFA/

~Tim

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 1:57 AM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This should be easy to resolve, but we have to ask as it's pretty
> important:
>
> Question 7 of the shepherd writeup, about the authors and BCP 78/79,
> appears
> not to have been answered.  Were these declarations made?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I suggest breaking Section 6 into two subsections, one for each batch of
> registry operations.
>
> A possibly ignorant question about YANG modules: Since RFCs 3319 and 8987
> are
> referenced from within the module itself, shouldn't they be normative
> references?
>
>
>
>