Re: [dhcwg] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-05

"Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com> Fri, 21 July 2017 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B2B1294A2; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZTC01yGLwjfa; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A4F126C2F; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=27061; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1500611015; x=1501820615; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=TcNQc5y3bIMjAIOrMbXiov0q1Uy1qV6GDCQekqdctk4=; b=CuOq/kT7LMmyJQ1E/ZaEPfb/6m/HBc1n9WA+/0/jpfFmu5O2nGSGYP6S 4xW8y28TL76j2CYJ4+xOEebLL1WALwexVsH+Xb38HNPN4gVoRLxwQlmXN mYNRwqvjEy58UHTpWLWo7pd9DFDXv5qYCjlTMrarfoOkaM0AJrtxdn4An 4=;
X-Files: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-06-from-5.diff.html, ATT00001.txt : 17970, 616
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DJAABkgHFZ/4sNJK1cGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBgy0tZIEUB44FkWeWBYIRLIM8gV8CGoNbPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQIBIwpMBQsCAQYCGCAKAgICMCUCBA4FDooZCBCTWZ1kgiaLIwEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ4PgyiFWYJ5hFSDKTCCMQEEilGMeoJghRYChCuCHYEBhxS?= =?us-ascii?q?FO4IMGT6EeYkVgUSVXgEfOIEKdRVJEgGER4I8dgGIeIEOAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,387,1496102400"; d="txt'?html'217?scan'217,208,217";a="272659802"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jul 2017 04:23:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6L4NYMf024520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:23:34 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 23:23:33 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 23:23:33 -0500
From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
To: Ralf Weber <ralf.weber@nominum.com>
CC: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port.all@ietf.org>, "Enke Chen (enkechen)" <enkechen@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-05
Thread-Index: AQHTAVDdC/pmVM+g8UmmGrJI4+prW6JeA2gA
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:23:33 +0000
Message-ID: <B560FD8D-FFF1-4D2E-947B-A1F1BD3AA6DA@cisco.com>
References: <150055249283.9589.17482424577250077220@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150055249283.9589.17482424577250077220@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.76.31]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_003_B560FD8DFFF14D2E947BA1F1BD3AA6DAciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/kNNobeqcKAeXxp7UZMgfkMUOdgI>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-05
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:23:38 -0000

Hi Ralf,

Thanks for your review of this document. Your
suggestion makes lot of sense.
I’m going to add the below sentence in the section 4:

“.., to allow the stateless operation in a relay chain, …”

to make the motivation clear for this dhcpv6 relay option.

the rfcdiff file is attached.

Cheers,
- Naiming