Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 and IPv6ND

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 16 November 2017 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F161293E0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hxf9h6opTjxt for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B383A12773A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id r62so6344935pfd.5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=nFYhdw0YgbYjzmE27tYKsSBK/4VulIAHZ3ygfM1rfOc=; b=IIJFX4CR2n6xJxPap0tpbv4n0V+bEiNe4NCRhDosQfDuwRIQQ+TOiobFYVFsmmWE2P EnmwibbKgFXU5KVTNYQQx+/DN+LcXAjxr2QCQQ7yMXOTAet0TNUmqAIZpu2ieNI3/Vu6 bq2hqxUG81txDif0yoBzK53Lvlrpp6XXvKNiy6ce6mgiBz0G0nYU0wsxkA/ntwTfXB+i D6hADFAXcRTsO/ZRYC7wfLh2vu1jB/X6YaSlCzCZng4fGJyM1CfCVPfFak1LlwrWJzr8 k7GYysAPtAyXRJAt6/1fp0I0aXIzYzTV+32yBFLnuMIDKmhWu5w8JgxdJjMRGnIxP+C3 A4mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=nFYhdw0YgbYjzmE27tYKsSBK/4VulIAHZ3ygfM1rfOc=; b=l5itJvhF/ZDNR+vW153fDnM1l0+Pvs7nCIw2r2XrcuDC58YYKGcSVIs7ULw3Ce0nxi GauXI4epHYz30YQ2/c15wcMEMzVmAgFFQSABXd8SefFLcW5Qx6UpTFz9c1OJKv2DFryk 0MW3Wxa8bQs5zfQSQe38vmGFwgSFNj6YrJJU/UM6Xjtf6cu+W0pp+Roj42yVoSHQ6+b4 S//lKUdgHg8ZNkQVdpD+CHSZcbhdGf0N78i0FKGLqUFLG9xVXtpmcZBo36gl6AAGikci PSvL13OS004qsAK8oKei16KkF7m+6NjeT6mdJVDVmF79FErwqzUaRhofApKoR/sZHH09 6j+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6bdVFSGTmNQveqydA31EylHDgBnYxfHl97Pnk0MYkfzWvfOIYJ anGQPgKLqANWdng8FIySHyEfXQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZXtYsxdvm8Pyel/qO3vPBnsvacJGfYNhVgazgOuTuOEae6cjJ8erKTSD4sTuWp9JaNIcHAcQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.234.9 with SMTP id t9mr771262pfh.92.1510814437092; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:5032:73d8:c096:511a? ([2001:67c:1232:144:5032:73d8:c096:511a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14sm961318pgf.50.2017.11.15.22.40.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <CA800BAA-8BA4-4264-9062-EE584B39D29E@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BAA8F50C-2760-4A77-82CE-33221F7B0AB5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:40:32 +0800
In-Reply-To: <3f898368-6222-d87c-7baa-38dea51a6980@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <cf2e41a05fd742a3b576ee317c5392f6@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <E94F8CD6-EC4E-4B61-92B6-99FBD1D494A4@fugue.com> <8d935331012947aa942e8dc2a48d889f@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <54D1B686-A5FA-42A0-8A57-067562313488@fugue.com> <38ef2544-df5c-4677-ffaa-7b084eb300fa@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1k7CBvTOHFFoNeS6TMq_dkvSQTJ4TXR=Yt8S-6p--eabg@mail.gmail.com> <e4df5049-2548-6762-994d-a12c8f663e59@gmail.com> <8E4C374A-DA6D-4FAB-AAEA-7EB4A2A655D8@fugue.com> <68a1f0db-58d3-fe0e-8169-127c0b629df1@gmail.com> <89CE6E3F-7501-4A8D-9A1B-5638A8845E7D@fugue.com> <7ef058e6-0360-f86c-b7d8-8eaf129a7f95@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=o+N64kdoYSSG38rwazAj_Lj9xLUV4uDCAzxbcpref1g@mail.gmail.com> <d194e3a4-620f-dde3-c836-3b5122d2805b@gmail.com> <FA0DADA0-CD16-4538-9E71-19922AD106B9@cisco.com> <c1209cd5-270e-63fe-8d78-c6371f9f56ef@gmail.com> <2907A64D-BB00-4922-BA6F-AA596AC878AB@fugue.com> <0b88f8af-2cbd-e6b2-ff22-50d682a66e8f@gmail.com> <953BFAD3-BAD7-4A1D-A102-2A6C7873052C@fugue.com> <3f898368-6222-d87c-7baa-38dea51a6980@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/kn3nfwiWmPvGWqg4Qph2dSU3KTM>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 and IPv6ND
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:40:48 -0000

On Nov 16, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> If so, this entire issue about making DHCPv6 work on 3GPP networks should be forgotten.   It's impossible to make it work.

It is not impossible.   It is impossible for the IETF.

If you want to define a standard for 3GPP to do DHCP over a different port, that sounds fine.   But it's not an IETF thing—this is a specifically 3GPP problem, and it doesn't make any sense to write an IETF standard to work around it.   Suppose we did so: what advice would we give to implementors?