RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6

Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 16:41 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13561 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:41:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id LAA08667 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:41:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA08175; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:30:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA08140 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:30:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from calcite.rhyolite.com (calcite.rhyolite.com [192.188.61.3]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13182 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:30:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from vjs@localhost) by calcite.rhyolite.com (8.12.2.Beta4/8.12.2.Beta4) id g0GGUSF9017651 for dhcwg@ietf.org env-from <vjs>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:30:28 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:30:28 -0700 (MST)
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200201161630.g0GGUSF9017651@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org

> From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>
> To: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>om>, dhcwg@ietf.org

> > Doesn't IPv6 have an equivalent to the router discovery protocol?
>
> Router discovery via NDP.

Was my point about the proposed DHCP option clear?


Vernon Schryver    vjs@rhyolite.com

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg