Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* Minutes from dhc WG meeting at IETF 57

Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com> Wed, 30 July 2003 18:20 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11624; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hvXR-0005jH-NN; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:19:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hvWk-0005d4-BR for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:18:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11543 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:18:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19hvWf-0002Ss-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:18:13 -0400
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19hvWe-0002Sp-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:18:12 -0400
Received: from depa.dmes.org (dsl093-187-232.chi2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.187.232]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9753B1B22A4; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:09:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* Minutes from dhc WG meeting at IETF 57
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:18:36 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030730062737.04270d38@funnel.cisco.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730132104.04394898@funnel.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030730132104.04394898@funnel.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200307301318.36392.mellon@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wednesday 30 July 2003 12:22, Ralph Droms wrote:
> Oops.  Both I and the taker-of-the-minutes got this point wrong.  Good
> catch.  So, if we decided to call these fields "reserved", will RCODES
> simply not be carried in the option?

I think that's the point.   It might be necessary to set the fields to 255 so 
that we don't confuse old clients.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg