RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxyserver-opt-00
"Richard Barr Hibbs" <rbhibbs@pacbell.net> Tue, 20 April 2004 19:36 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA16768 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG0uv-0004HZ-Q9 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:28:25 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3KJSPMx016456 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:28:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG0dU-0003AT-PL for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:10:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA14439 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:10:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BG0dR-0001jO-QD for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:10:21 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BG0cd-0001gS-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:09:31 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BG0c3-0001bc-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:08:55 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG0Te-00080d-K9; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:00:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG0CE-00012u-Ja for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:42:14 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11670 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BG0CB-0007En-K1 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:42:11 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BG0Ba-0007CS-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:41:34 -0400
Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.82]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BG0Az-00078I-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:40:57 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO BarrH63p601) (rbhibbs@pacbell.net@64.169.89.34 with login) by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2004 18:40:56 -0000
Reply-To: rbhibbs@pacbell.net
From: Richard Barr Hibbs <rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxyserver-opt-00
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:49:11 -0700
Message-ID: <EJEFKKCLDBINLKODAFMDMEKEDCAA.rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040420112046.02f506d0@flask.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I agree with Bernie's suggestion, but hope that the final text includes BOTH a drawing of the proposed option AND one or two examples. --Barr example: 1 2 4 8 10 +------+-----+----------+----- ... ------+---------+--- ... |Option| Len |Proto Nbr.|Proxy IP Address|Port Nbr.| +------+-----+----------+----- ... ------+---------+--- ... /<-------- First Proxy Tuple -------->/ Option Header: option-code: (TBD), Len: 24 (octets) Proxy for HTTP: Proto: 80, Proxy IP: http-proxy-server-1, Port: 8080 Proxy for HTTP: Proto: 80, Proxy IP: http-proxy-server-2, Port: 8080 Proxy for FTP: Proto: 21, Proxy IP: ftp-proxy-server-1, Port: 21 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Droms > Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 08:21 > > Bernie made a suggestion about the syntax of the > option. Any comment from > the WG? > > - Ralph > > At 01:52 PM 4/12/2004 -0400, Bernie Volz wrote: > >Perhaps this has been discussed in the past and > discarded, but what > >about removing the need for yet-another-list? If > the option where > >changed not to use sub-options at all but > instead carried tuples of: > > 2-octets of well-known protocol number > > 4-octets of proxy server internet address > > 2-octets of proxy server port number > >The option length would then be multiples of 8 bytes. > > > >For example: > > Option Header: TBD-option-code,24-bytes > > Proxy for HTTP: 80,http-proxy-server-1,8080 > > Proxy for HTTP: 80,http-proxy-server-2,8080 > > Proxy for FTP: 21,ftp-proxy-server-1,21 > > > >This avoids the need for future protocols to > have an enumeration and the > >current "getservicename" calls can be used to > find the port numbers. > > > >Otherwise, I recommend moving this draft forward. > > > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxys… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Richard Barr Hibbs
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Richard Barr Hibbs
- [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxys… Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxys… Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Senthil Kumar B
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-pr… Bernie Volz