Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A8A94@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 21:07:42 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1FF595DD-C7F5-475D-93BB-EC7E64428EBD@gmail.com>
References: <20121214022919.19971.21882.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <CAAfac2gCqq4KxCUt3pd5danhhgdPbNCakBXJwGooPx1jyGEmag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAfac2i9f+nA-S6bsoRy58gOn+mj8fnniVPr3PHNgZXboDwztQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL10_BrnrQbO4Bzq5mE_9s_e1-jtCtb=Nq5wjaUr0mE3fTUv9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061966F0@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
 <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747458F@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
 <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A118C@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
 <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307474754C3@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
 <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A2F00@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
 <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747475B92@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
 <CAL10_Bq-zkZv7hD0CVD8notzh2O5gBipLs4ACn3qQQVX8jXQ3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOpJ=k1vt=ZQS=j-7VPRUYwOOBfO2xe5FR0r6gx3TLtQz8hcFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL10_BqNqbCuSVX=phGPgJ65cX9L2j0FwRANw8qxDHv=wfW1cw@mail.gmail.com>
 <510A6327.6050506@s-carlsen.dk> <CAOpJ=k00n2_8DEgQP+bRtLz
 hGtOL1gy8AyFH4PO2cABQ20PAOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A471E@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
 <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1844B249@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
 <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A8A94@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com>,
 Bud Millwood <budm@weird-solutions.com>, Lemon Ted <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>,
 dhcwg@ietf.org, Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-00.txt
Precedence: list

(resending to dhcwg mailing list)

On Feb 1, 2013, at 5:59 PM 2/1/13, Dmitry Anipko =
<Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Agree with everything you wrote. I think several minutes waiting would =
be fine, and I understand there may be good reasons for such waiting =
interval (as opposed to hour).
>=20
> If there is a general agreement on these 2 adjustments (allowed =
waiting period cap and INF_MAX_RT default), how do we move forward - =
Ralph, can these be included in the next revision of the draft?
>=20
> Thank you.

Adding INF_MAX_RT makes sense.

In my opinion, the right thing to say about waiting for a response is =
something vague, to the effect of "A client is not expected to listen =
for a response during the entire period between transmission of Solicit =
or Information-Request messages."

- Ralph