Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-shen-dhc-client-port-03 - Respond by October 24, 2016

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D675129563 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHZtUB5o3D1z for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE2A12952B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id b75so51145375lfg.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XmjhqPc6uPIRGVGHJc8ePJbjMqDn4VFEcrD9VLC+vsY=; b=Kw57HYxbIXU1GgA64oIvj9Z3WifWdLhUcEtW80G8TRcAkJL3k7cT4R2MHdTaHFPBo1 ccrQvZfrmiCo1KIbhlbr5/HOdwIeHapkpFIZItYP8ZebclD8FH3iKadhPHnj6C6yI0/x 4+UqpFc3/azoPtDD+Zhb7lbP2MdR4SH2nXqNn0+e4stDHfeulQwaxn2FflYunRyuBSz/ QhUXJn6412GJc5CtMqYNiil6ljf0XHjbEPRB5TvdHNxt5OdCUkawLvRO/i/QclqpGCJM ry/QRHuoYbskWpw3Ez2aIZuvFSnhLlhzpfKUB0EEZciZjyQKMF14pGazCDrUBhhsVw0k i/Tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XmjhqPc6uPIRGVGHJc8ePJbjMqDn4VFEcrD9VLC+vsY=; b=bLBG0Op62UjnPplvzPcomJfWQSF2JUAGX0fTph5f3PrmcWTSxrcvB3i+nheOfWrylD NVtb750S5BxKg3JLgsygI19dzCfW6IeF5HuXuw/osCm3Ggu27TmEWOjmn5Hj+Si9Vxsl sEQSRtz52jcJx/jociFkqmBwUdh4ptzJzllDeZx/X7j/rd/NpSdPhgMF52MdNvlp2s1H CVN5S7ySS7ziFKo76KIzFMRnQQbZzkOE8sSVnD7duwnP00q5SYij4nnBASAehf35Ygi2 aMGP/SQcscG82lYWCcIBEf2WyMyJjDhdSlzTmqshlYw9hY7bIm1JPjKHoU+hFG5fG0wX QnkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnBbYxAkX+GUAraLZSHDTfrdZ16ZRj/Wjwlf1ZHLlxP3blb6qm7EJgHOMh71zac4v1/UQAwE3jiZEAmvA==
X-Received: by 10.25.65.204 with SMTP id o195mr3962716lfa.176.1476206710008; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <002501d2239a$c74a0b60$55de2220$@arberg.dk>
References: <7b64812b6fe54b13a3a084ec551a1c33@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <4C54428A-5FD9-4FD3-9406-27FE36A0E07F@cisco.com> <002501d2239a$c74a0b60$55de2220$@arberg.dk>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:24:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mb03QoFCe4UZvqF4kzgkiYUpJtDZZPV1WQBMScP2GtWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: peter@arberg.dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/ltYD-v4qrgHGwgXXDYLbQ5ON4PQ>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-shen-dhc-client-port-03 - Respond by October 24, 2016
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:25:18 -0000

I support adoption.   There are some issues with the way it updates
2131 and 3315; I don't think that's the right approach.   But that's a
minor issue; otherwise the work appears to be worth doing, and the
document is generally solid.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Peter Arberg <peter@arberg.dk> wrote:
> I support this document moving forward.
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi:
>
>
>
> This message initiates a two week long WG adoption call (respond by Oct 24,
> 2016) on:
>
>
>
> Title: Generalized Source UDP Port of DHCP Relay
>
> Pages: 7
>
> Date: 2016-08-19
>
> Document: draft-shen-dhc-client-port-03
>
> Link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-dhc-client-port-03
>
>
>
> This was presented at the Berlin IETF-96 (see
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-dhc-3.pdf) The hum
> after the presentation for adoption was soft for adoption, and silent
> against.
>
>
>
> Substantive comments and statements of support for adopting this document
> should be directed to the mailing list. Minor editorial suggestions can be
> sent to the authors. The co-chairs will determine the consensus after
> October 24, 2016.
>
>
>
> -          Tomek & Bernie
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>